meep_launcher@lemm.ee to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoJust 2 people.i.imgur.comexternal-linkmessage-square142linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkJust 2 people.i.imgur.commeep_launcher@lemm.ee to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square142linkfedilink
minus-squareTolookah@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoIf every church houses two homeless people, no more homeless people.
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoAssuming the distribution is the same for both
minus-squarehuginn@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years ago(it’s not) But the point is not invalid. It’s a problem that seems insurmountable but can definitely be tackled.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoAlthough homeless people absolutely can and do migrate. They prefer cities for somewhat similar reasons to everyone else, and with no place they are allowed to live why not go for somewhere with lots of opportunities and shorter walks?
If every church houses two homeless people, no more homeless people.
Assuming the distribution is the same for both
(it’s not)
But the point is not invalid. It’s a problem that seems insurmountable but can definitely be tackled.
Although homeless people absolutely can and do migrate. They prefer cities for somewhat similar reasons to everyone else, and with no place they are allowed to live why not go for somewhere with lots of opportunities and shorter walks?