kingpepe8006@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoOnion be onioning againsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageOnion be onioning againsh.itjust.workskingpepe8006@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 day agoSchadensfreude isn’t invalid, it’s just a rare variant. The “s” allows for a smoother connection between the two words. If this spelling is confusing, just pretend the “s” is silent.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 day agoI mean, it’s at least not valid in German. There might be people using that word in English, I don’t know.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 day agoZe fix? Ich stehe korrigiert, danke! Aber zu meiner Verteidigung: laut Ngram-Viewer ist Schadenfreude (~0.000130%) 144-mal so häufig wie Schadensfreude (~0.00000090%).
It’s actually Schadenfreude
Schadensfreude isn’t invalid, it’s just a rare variant. The “s” allows for a smoother connection between the two words. If this spelling is confusing, just pretend the “s” is silent.
Do you mean silent as in ilent?
I mean, it’s at least not valid in German. There might be people using that word in English, I don’t know.
Ze fix? Ich stehe korrigiert, danke!
Aber zu meiner Verteidigung: laut Ngram-Viewer ist Schadenfreude (~0.000130%) 144-mal so häufig wie Schadensfreude (~0.00000090%).