It’s especially infuriating because there are so many sites that allow unrestricted access to porn, yet Arizona chose to bully one in particular.

Here’s a link to the news. https://e621.net/news_updates

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    0·
    9 months ago

    I’m pretty sure that viewing pornography can be harmful to young children.

    Not all “minors”, but some people forget that the phrase includes both 17 year olds and 4 year olds in some states…

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      0·
      9 months ago

      If a 4 year old is exposed to furry porn, I don’t think the culprit is the website.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        0·
        9 months ago

        I didn’t assign blame to the website, or to anything. I just said that viewing sexual material can be harmful to children.

        • Gabu@lemmy.ml
          0·
          9 months ago

          Which is the problem with completely open ended language, which is always used in such bills so as to only apply to whoever they want to persecute.