• radiant_bloom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    My $400 watch also tells the weather and has my calendar ! That’s an actual upgrade. A Rolex Logo is not.

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      In 10 years that Rolex will hold its value, and may even appreciate in value as they often do.

      Even a $40 Casio will still be working good as new in 10 years with less than $5 in parts & labor.

      Your $400 smart watch will be literal garbage because its battery is nonreplaceable.

      • radiant_bloom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Last time I checked replacing the battery cost $60

        Also, I can buy new smart watches every time the battery gets used up, or updates stop coming ; and at the end of my life I won’t even be halfway to a Rolex’s price tag.

        The Casio though, that is a good deal.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is super dependent on the watch itself, watch batteries aren’t inherently unreplaceable.

        If your problem is e-waste, disposable vapes are by far a larger contributor than a single watch that someone will use for years before buying a new one.

        • Patches@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          My problem isn’t with either. I am just stating that your average Smart Watch isn’t going to be worth anything in 10 years. There is the battery itself, then the fact that software at best is supported for 3 maybe 4 years, hardware support may or may not exist.

          They are inherently disposable while a Rolex, and most watches are capable, if not intended, to be heritage pieces capable of surviving decades.

          It’s not Apples to Apples.

          • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            If you are buying expensive jewelry to hold value that’s fine, but that’s not what everyone is doing or wants. If you don’t care about e-waste then frankly I’m not sure why you care what other people spend their money on.

    • Knasen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      But the one with the Rolex logo will most likely retain it’s value over multiple years and might even increase.

      Yours will probably be out of software updates and incompatible within a couple of years.

      • radiant_bloom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        But even if I replace my watch every time it stops getting updates, I can do that for multiple lifetimes before it costs me anywhere close to what a Rolex would have 😅

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Value is a false system - just because you ‘value’ something doesn’t mean it is actually logically worth anywhere near that amount. Plus, ones personal decision of ‘value’ doesn’t mean shit if 1) they aren’t selling it and 2) others don’t share the ‘value’. I can go to Walmart, stand in the doorway, and tell people that they owe me money for being in my presence. But if they don’t also share the sentiment, I’m not going to make any money.

        • Knasen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Have you looked at the second hand market of used Rolex Watches vs First Generations of Smart Watches?

          I’m not trying to put anyone down jut fact remains,you can flip the Rolex you buy on the second hand market and get money back after 10+ years.ä without any problems.