The authors argue that centuries of imperialism, extractive capitalism, and population growth have pushed Earth’s ecosystems beyond their limits, and created a broadening pattern of social inequality. The review summarizes the grave threats facing the planet but rejects a “doom and gloom” philosophy. Instead, the authors argue, the threats should motivate swift and substantial actions.

According to the authors, a global economic model focused on wealth accumulation and profit, rather than true sustainability, is a major impediment to decarbonization, conserving natural resources, and ensuring social equity. Therefore, the authors argue, governments should enforce radical, immediate cuts in fossil fuel use, eliminate environmentally harmful subsidies, and restrict trade that generates pollution or unsustainable consumption.

  • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    What is the empirical process these scientists used for determining what the human race collectively ought to do?

      • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I threw it in ChatGPT for a summary as a curiosity but I know without reading that the scientists are going well beyond their qualifications in trying to presuppose why they are seeing what they are seeing and are well beyond their qualifications in supposing how we could or should solve it. Much less why.

    • Sims@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s never nice to discover that what you’ve been told your whole life - was just capitalist propaganda…