• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    That is not a great idea. KDE prioritizes features and customization over stability and out of the box experience.

    The spin is there for those who want it.

    • different_base@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Exactly. While I love Plasma for what it is, I also don’t love certain things like lack of polish, stability etc. Again no offense. Fedora Workstation aims to be a stable OS with sensible defaults for wider audience including home users, disabled people and developers who want to get things done rather than tweaking their OS. GNOME may not have great customizability as Plasma but it is stable and well polished for average user.

    • m4@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      KDE prioritizes features and customization over stability and out of the box experience.

      I mean, the fact that the very new major release of KDE almost hadn’t added new features and focused on a rather smooth upgrade kinda proves otherwise.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        KDE has tons of customization which is great for people who want to rice. Back in the day I was into ricing and DIY Linux. However, KDE is a poor choice for a mainstream workstation as there are way to many configuration options which leads to everything getting buried. It also doesn’t look as nice out of the box.

        I think the KDE spin is great for those who want to customize. For everyone else there is gnome and its derivatives

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Like the stability of blowing up extensions and APIs across minor point releases?

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I felt that way before meeting a GNOME dev. Their target audience is the whole world of users who either don’t already have a computer or don’t know how to use one. They don’t want people customizing their apps. They don’t want a calculator named anything other than “Calculator”. They’re target audience is the 2B users that we don’t currently interact with.

        • drwankingstein@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean that’s fine, but when people complain about text being too blurry and not sharp enough, their response was something along the lines of sharpness not being the sole metric for performance…

          who the fuck does that? and they do this shit all the time

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I too hate Gnome with an unreasonable passion.

      So I just don’t use it.

      If others want to subject themselves to it, well, I’m not one to kink shame.

  • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve been using gnome as a “base” DE for years, what that means is I install it, then install my tiling wm and use all the gnome utilities.

    I recently had to set up a few new machines and decided to try KDE on a couple and I’m really enjoying it. I haven’t even gotten around to installing a tiling wm because I want to learn a wayland option and that’ll take some time. I haven’t ran into pain points listed here but one thing I like is when I want to do X, there’s usually already something ready to do X for me. Years of gnome and I felt like the devs were always fighting me. I haven’t really used a full gnome setup in a few years though, but I know the “mommy knows best” attitude is still prevalent with the devs.

      • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Polonium

        Hm I’m not sure if that’d really give me what I’m looking for. I know its certainly possible to configure KDE and Polonium to get me 90% there but I think I’d rather just have a normal floating setup I can switch to if need be. I’d need to remap a significant amount of keyboard shortcuts that would stop making sense in the context of a full floating DE.

        I really just want a very fast app launcher like dmenu, dynamic tiling, and monitor independent workspaces. I have a particular setup using certain alpha keys for my workspace.

        I never really enjoyed the experience of tacking things onto an existing DE and having to mess with UI configuration. I’ve been really loving XMonad for a few setups and my ideal wm would be something that’s extremely low power and low fluff. Even if I only eek out 10% more battery life, breaking the 10hr mark is more valuable to me than most bells and whistles.

        I’m just really lazy. I could load up my xmonad setup in 20 minutes but I wanted to see the state of wayland and that requires learning a new wm’s configuration quirks.

    • Para_lyzed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Red Hat doesn’t have influence over the development of Fedora, that’s the job of FESCo. Red Hat owns the trademark and is one of the sponsors of the Fedora Project, but their interest is solely in enterprise applications (a task that is not suitable for Fedora), not in consumer desktop platforms. I’ve already discussed this at length here and here if you’d like more detail; there’s no point in rewriting it.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s probably not gonna happen, but it’s great that this discussion is happening at all. Maybe it’ll encourage Gnome to improve their customizability, which seems to be the main advantage point of KDE

      • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well then, it’s an interesting proposal because it would be nice to see a major player default to KDE. I don’t see it happening though.

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Man, why do people publish serious announcements on April 1st? Between the XZ backdoor that almost pwned all of Linux, a Silksong update, Bellular News taking some absolutely degenerate stance with games “journalism”, and this, I don’t know what the fuck to believe.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Defended Kotaku sucking up to SBI, downplayed and ignored SBI’s harrassment campaigns and the apparent racism of some of its employees. There’s also some conflict of interest because his company is in bed with SBI. I skimmed through most of the videos, it’s really not worth my time.

          According to some comments, he also said some ridiculous things in support of SBI’s witch hunt against a particular Steam user on twitter, but I won’t go wading into that cesspool, so can’t verify.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      timezones are always crazy on 1 April. My initial assumption was it’s a joke. It would be awesome though! More people should use or at least try KDE.

  • aleph@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I personally don’t see the Fedora team breaking away from Gnome just yet, but he makes some good points.

    Starting in 2025, KDE Plasma’s release cycle switches to a semi-annual cadence that lines up with Fedora Linux releases, enabling a tight interlock of development and integration between Fedora and KDE.

    This is the key change that might make such a move viable, imo. The benefit of Gnome to point release distros, and Fedora in particular, is the predictable 6-month release cycle.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    In the end I don’t care whether the “default” Fedora is KDE or GNOME, as long as the spin of the other DE is maintained well. Except for the ootb experience which is better on the GNOME version with setup steps for proprietary drivers and whatnot, the KDE spin feels like a first-class citizen.

    But KDE just makes more sense for most users I feel. Currently you start wondering where your tray icons went (for example) when switching from a non-Linux OS. For gaming, KDE is simply more mature with built-in Wayland VRR support for example.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      To be fair, it would make much more sense to switch to KDE for distributions like Ubuntu. Fedora never sold itself as a distribution targeting new Linux users coming from other operating systems. Therefore at least that point shouldn’t be the reason to use KDE. Also distributions aren’t just for new users and should not decide too much because of that. On top of that, a user is new for a very short period of time anyway. I digress…

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Whether it makes sense for Ubuntu I’m not sure, but I don’t think that it would make less sense on Fedora either way.

        Fedora is a “batteries included” distro the way I see it, and besides, I don’t see how KDE likely feeling more familiar for, say, Windows users makes it a worse choice for experienced Linux users.

        A big part of what should be the default DE for a given distro is obviously very subjective, so I’d actually be surprised if they really changed the default because of this proposal. It has valid points and I’d say KDE is on average more appealing to the very broad target audience that Fedora aims to have, although as I said: that’s just my opinion/gut feeling.

        As long as KDE support stays at least as good as it has been so far in Fedora, I’ll be happy.

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Fedora is a “batteries included” distro

          You obviously don’t have NVIDIA, kudos, but no CUDA… Also, some of us like codecs, etc.

          • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I wasn’t saying everything is included, and sure, proprietary things like Nvidia drivers aren’t included (and I’m aware of the mesa-freeworld packages that replace the bundled ones). I was referring to Fedora being a “complete” experience in a sense that you get a preconfigured desktop environment, an installer where you can say “just install to this drive, I don’t care about anything else” and quite a few preinstalled applications. It’s not like Arch for example, where you manually partition your drives and chroot into your system to install packages and a bootloader just to get up and running.

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I know, that’s available just now with Fedora 40. And you have to know that the flag exists, it’s not a visible setting until you enable it. With KDE it’s just there (and has been for quite a while).

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I will happily use any desktop environment that allows me to bring up a summary of all active windows by pressing the super key. That’s just too ingrained in me now. I even find myself mindlessly doing it on Windows.