cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/37022405

This is a carrier in the USA (T-Mobile).

I did a quick search for the other 2 carriers using the term “[Carrier Name] Family Tracking” and Verizon and AT&T also seems to have it.

And according to https://www.t-mobile.com/support/plans-features/t-mobile-familywhere-app, it says:

FamilyWhere uses geolocation data from the T-Mobile network and is not affected by changes to device location settings.

So it appears that its using cell tower triangulation. Turning on Airplane Mode should stop it (assuming there isn’t a separate tracking app on your phone)

Oh Wow, What a wonderful tool for abusive spouses and abusive parents. And telecom companies are making money off of it. 🙃

TLDR: Its a good idea to get your own separate cellular plan.

  • easily3667@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Hey bud welcome to 2015

    The won’t somebody think of the children joke…not a joke.

  • 800XL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Or, “hey we’ve been doing this for the police and gov’t for free and we have the tech so why not sell it?”

  • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    The sort of thing that’d be really fucking useful, anywhere in the last twenty years - if it was built by privacy nerds. If I’m out with people at a mall or whatever, we should be able to exchange GPS coordinates once per second, using approximately zero percent of any modern server.

    But it should be extremely opt-in. Like not even an option to turn on and leave on. And if any fucking brand ever sees that data, the person responsible can track my phone’s trajectory through their front window.

  • MoonlightFox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have been thinking about how or if I would track my own children. I do not have any at the moment though.

    I think the only system that would work with tracking and still be ethical is a system with accountability.

    They need to know that I would never check unless there was an emergency. So we’d have to have some sort of immutable log that they can check regularly. So they know if I checked their location. It should not be like a panopticon. in which they don’t know if the parent is checking their location or not. That changes behaviour. Even with the trust that I would not check, just me having the option would alter behaviour probably.

    Youth and kids are independent individuals with their own rights to privacy, autonomy, right to select their own friends and acquaintences, right to freedom of expression and movement, right to make mistakes, etc. If they are thought right and have a high trust bond with their parents, preferably with little judgement, then it will probably be fine and most issues can be solved.

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah making it optional for them to turn on because they are still entitled to privacy even though they are children is the key to building trust. Them trusting you as a parent is the most essential thing here, there is always a way around something, you want them being honest by choice rather than sneaky or you forcing “honesty” by coercion.

      We always did that from when the kids were younger and my now adult daughter still chooses to turn it on when going on dates.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 hours ago

      A reciprocal arrangement would also work. My little terror will soon be at the point of having a mobile phone. My wife and I already share locations in real time. They will get the same arrangement. We can check on them, however, they can also check on our location. Moving on from this, in the future will be a negotiation, not an ultimatum.

      It’s also worth noting however, that a level of accountability is required with phones and social media for children. Knowing that mum or dad might go through their phone to check things makes them think about what they are doing. It is also required to make sure they don’t err too badly. The key is to be open, clear and reasonable in your requirements of them. Also, never mock or belittle. To you, it might be a cute minor kids spat. To them, it’s the life or death of their entire social life.

      If you have a good relationship with your children, these will be a non-issues. Mutual respect (not fear) is a FAR better position to take, parenting wise.

      • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Knowing that mum or dad might go through their phone to check things makes them think about what they are doing spend 5 minutes researching how to hide stuff. Better to rely on trust then on pure force alone

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 hours ago

          There’s trust in intent and trust in judgement. My goal is to train them so that I can trust their intent. Any search will be to cover lapses in judgement. If they are hiding things, then that is intentional. If they have thought about it enough to hide it, then at least they have thought about it.

          My intent is to spot things like grooming, or bullying (at a level they can’t cope with). Things they might not understand the severity at the time. It gives us a nuclear option, it won’t be used lightly.

  • NightShot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I share my location with my wife just in case I end up in a ditch dying while riding my motorcycle.

    • dustycups@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have very mixed feelings about androids crash detection. The personal privacy is fine but - fucking google.

      • octobob@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        21 hours ago

        My fiance triggers his all the time by air drumming or throwing his phone around haha.

        It’ll be like “were you in a crash?? Do you wanna call 911??”

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        You supposedly hate Google, yet have an android… The fuck is wrong with you?

        • easily3667@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Your alternative is a worse company. Android and especially Google’s phones are very secure and very private if reconfigured from stock. You won’t get that kind of security+privacy combo from any other vendor.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          There are several major degoogled Android projects, while Linux on phones is nowhere near mature enough for mainstream use yet.

          • Xanza@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            De-googled projects get none of the benefit of being android, while all of the downfall of being android. So either use it or don’t. It simply doesn’t make any sense.

            It’s like buying a Tesla and then replacing all of the systems within it because you hate Tesla. Like, wtf. Why would you buy it then? End of the day its your money, do what you want, but still. What the fuck.

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              get none of the benefit of being android

              As someone who uses Graphene… No? It gets the benefit of being usable as a daily driver and having tons of apps. What exact perks are you talking about? You overestimate the benefit Google gives to the OS’ user.

              • Xanza@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                Google Play Services is at the very core of Android and it will only get worse from here, and a very significant portion of the Android ecosystem requires GPS to function. Auto updates, built-in Android security features, a significant portion of secure apps like banking and financial service applications, Find my Phone, Cloud Backups, etc. The list goes on. And it’s funny because each one of these removed features are generally replaced with a third party alternative, which means you’re still trusting a third party with your data… I could understand if you didn’t want any company to have your data. That makes sense. But you specifically curtail Google who authors the OS in favor of a third party who also might be doing the same things with your data anyways. It’s all just so incredibly stupid.

                You may be completely happy with Graphene, but the overwhelming vast majority of people won’t be because it removes the specific advantages of using Android as an ecosystem.

                If you want to be free of Google, then be free of Google and don’t use hardware and an OS that they designed and made. It’s like hating Nazi’s but wearing an SS jacket because “it’s warm.” It’s fuckin’ mind-blindingly crazy.

                • pineapple@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I’m totally on engineeringgamings side. Both apple and Google are both bad companies imo but the Android operating system is probably the best thing Google has made and you have the ability to use it without any of the Google services.

                  I take advantage of side loading on a daily basis with repository’s like f droid and accresent as well as obtanium for installing apps from the source. And for the few apps I need i can use the aurora store all with never signing in with a google account.

                  For me the main feature of Android is side loading and I can take full advantage of that with no google account. In my opinion the idea of an ecosystem is a negative, i want the ability to not be locked in to any specific hardware or software vendor.

                • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  and a very significant portion of the Android ecosystem requires GPS to function

                  Which ones? Not encountered that except for maps.

                  Auto updates, built-in Android security features

                  At least Graphene does auto-updates of the system and basic apps just fine, and when it comes to installed apps - you can use F-Droid, Obtainium and other methods that can do it as well.

                  a significant portion of secure apps like banking and financial service applications

                  Yeah, those are often blocked off indeed. Although this depends too - for example, in my country all the major banks aside from one don’t require Google services, primarily to accommodate Huawei and other Chinaphones that come without Google services. Find My Phone - indeed, although there might still be workarounds, just not looked at that.

                  And it’s funny because each one of these removed features are generally replaced with a third party alternative, which means you’re still trusting a third party with your data…

                  Thing is - you have CHOICE in what third party to trust. And a lot of such choices are indeed more trustworthy than Google judging by prior history. You can eliminate middlemen, such as getting apps directly from the devs’ repos rather than from F-Droid. Oftentimes you can avoid a third-party entirely, as a lot of things are selfhostable.

                  You may be completely happy with Graphene, but the overwhelming vast majority of people won’t be because it removes the specific advantages of using Android as an ecosystem.

                  That’s not the same argument as you made previously - “De-googled projects get none of the benefit of being android, while all of the downfall of being android”. Removing Google does still leave a convenient daily driver - whether it’s suitable universally is another question.

      • NightShot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Didn’t know there existed a crash detection function. I just share my location to her all the time. She does the same. Yeah I agree but I rather let my wife relax than not knowing. My point is that not all loses of privacy have to be bad.

  • Majestic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is going to get DV victims killed. At least on phone tracking like iPhone’s family sharing makes it clear it’s happening and often has a way of disabling it when you make your final run for it allowing you to keep your phone.

    • easily3667@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Not really, diversity visa victims were probably going to be picked up by ice and deported to Ecuador anyway, regardless of what TMobile does.

      But also, this isn’t a new thing. Phones are literally always being tracked. If someone knows your number they could already pay a few bucks to locate your phone. This is why it’s recommended to make your “public” number a voip and never share your cell number with anyone.

    • easily3667@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Is that better or worse than “where you been all afternoon I been waiting for you?”

      But again, this isn’t new functionality. It’s a little easier than googling how to stalk someone by phone, but it’s not new.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 hours ago

        If someone asked the latter question, I’d think they’re concerned for my well-being.

        If somebody asked the former question, I’d think they’re stalking me.

  • J52@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Daylight robbery… Who’s still this mentally deprived to get another subscription based anything?

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you want to install free tracking tools, you’ll need consent or try to guess the lockscreen password to try to install it covertly.

      With this, its doesn’t require consent, since most families are on the same family plan.

      Only abusers would use this, since a normal person who actually cares about a family member’s safety would just ask them to install a tracking app voluntarily and be transparent about it.

      Its tracking either way, but doing so voluntarily is way less creepy and also free.

      Most modern Android and iOS allows you to share your locations for free via Google and Apple “Find My Phone” networks.

    • Dzso@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m sure that the “consent” is part of the terms and conditions when you sign up for a line on a family plan. Not that it’s genuinely informed consent, or that people know what they agreed to, but technically

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    These are great services. Insane that they charge them but there are great use cases. Sorry kids, but parents need to know where you are.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        No but my daughter does and knowing her mom and me can track her in the event of an emergency is a big relief for her and us. It lets her have more freedom and confidence then if we didn’t have it

    • corvus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      “Good morning daughter, how it was the date last night? great motel uh? ;)”

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Find My and Google’s device locator service exist, they’re free and work without a carrier. Ik they’re not that private, but you save money at least and they’re more private than your carrier.

    /s

    • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      But you need geolocation. This, at least, can track you scarily accurate. Cannot escape it except you have more money depending on which situation. (Like parents giving it for free to the child, so the only escape is to either have secretly a second phone with own carrier plan or be open and purchase your own carrier plan by gaslighting its needed)

  • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not a new thing, and I can definitely see good uses for this information. What they should have done is made it so that the one being tracked gets a log and real time notification any time someone is tracking them. This would alleviate some of the toxic spying behavior simply by making it transparent rather than covert.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    If we didn’t have this, my kids would have a lot less freedom. Knowing where they are gives me much more peace of mind to let them roam further, and for longer than I would otherwise 🤷‍♂️

    • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      aaand next time they’ll leave their cell phone home to not get tracked, so not only do you not get their location, they can’t even call you in an emergency

      good parenting, i guess

    • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I understand wanting to do this as a parent, but I’m so thankful I grew up without cell phones. I would never track a teenager. I feel like teenagers need space to assert their own autonomy and form an identity apart from their parents. When I think of the best moments I had with friends, it’s almost always something that would have technically gone against my parents’ knowledge and wishes, even though my parents were very good to me overall.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      My kids don’t even have phones, as they do not need them and they are unhealthy for the young brain’s development.

      I also don’t use location services on my phones. Fuck all that tracking bullshit.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s true but it’s not in the same ballpark as GPS tracking. The phone company knows what county I’m in but probably not what businesses and municipal buildings I enter on foot unlike GPS location services. Bluetooth and Wifi are also disabled when I leave the house to minimize those being used for device tracking.

          It’s just good practice to disable all the unused wireless radios in your pocket computer. Don’t turn them on until you need them on. It saves a lot of battery life too.

          • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            The phone company can get your location down to a few dozen feet depending on the number of 4G (50 to 70 metres) and 5G (10-50 metres) towers around.

          • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            The phone company knows what county I’m in but probably not what businesses and municipal buildings I enter on foot unlike GPS location services.

            They have your approximate location. If you are in a densely populated city, they might not know which specific building or which specific apartment unit, but they’ll have a small circle around the area, and if you are in a suburb, where things are more spaced out, they will know the exact stores you go to.

            If you go to a walmart with huge parking spaces all around it, its obvious you went to a walmart.

      • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        A cheap dumbphone could come in handy at almost any age* (calls, short SMS, especially in emergency situations). Though there is a possibility they wouldn’t want to be seen with that. Kids will bully each other for whatever isn’t a norm.
        Anyway, preferably a simpler one. I used to spend hours each day on Java games. Really, the only thing that stopped me was headaches.

        * Almost any - you don’t want a 3 year old calling 911 for fun

    • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I grew up in a time before cell phones, I had a lot more freedom than your kids will ever experience. Crime rates were much higher back then by the way. I still survived even though my parents rarely knew where I was between 4 and 6 pm, but I was always home in time for dinner.

          • entwine413@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            That’s not how anecdotal evidence works. Just because you aren’t aware of it being different for others doesn’t mean it wasn’t different for others.

          • Ledivin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Several kids from my elementary school disappeared, never to be heard from again. This happened again in middle school, and twice in high school.

            Just because you weren’t paying attention back then or don’t remember now doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. As you said, crime was worse then.

            Basically any time someone says “This didn’t happen back in my day!” the response can be “the dead ones can’t talk about it.”