That literally seems like a you problem… If you don’t understand math, it’s not math’s responsibility to change because plenty of people do understand math.
If I understand, I think your question can be rephrased as, “Should all concepts be presented so anyone can understand it?” To that version I would say yes, but it requires the person attempting understanding to have sufficient background.
Math is abstract, nothing is more abstract than it except maybe some logic problems. Why does math alone need to be this abstract,while being an important thing everyone should know?
If philosophy and logic that is that abstract is just dismissed as too abstract?
That literally seems like a you problem… If you don’t understand math, it’s not math’s responsibility to change because plenty of people do understand math.
If I understand, I think your question can be rephrased as, “Should all concepts be presented so anyone can understand it?” To that version I would say yes, but it requires the person attempting understanding to have sufficient background.
Math is abstract, nothing is more abstract than it except maybe some logic problems. Why does math alone need to be this abstract,while being an important thing everyone should know? If philosophy and logic that is that abstract is just dismissed as too abstract?