• Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Stupid question and I honestly don’t know.

    If Steam puts up a bunch of new Agreements, and you refuse to accept, you’ll continue using the non-updated version - correct?

    Where in this scenario, Blizzard just locks you out of your account?

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      If Steam puts up a bunch of new Agreements, and you refuse to accept, you’ll continue using the non-updated version - correct?

      In theory you could keep using the service that adheres to the old agreement - but they will only provide the service under the new agreement. So effectively, no.

      Unfortunately, Diablo 3 is an online game - even singleplayer. In case of starcraft, it’s even worse - the only reason for it to be online is multiplayer (fair enough) and drm (boo!).

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah, I think that a EULA change should reasonably permit for some kind of refund. Maybe have some mechanism for deprecating the value of the service based on use – like, if you expect a typical online game to be online for 10 years and a user has used it for 5 and the service wants to change the EULA, mandate the option for a 50% refund in lieu of continued service under the new EULA or something.

        That’d make games more expensive, but it’s a risk that companies could factor in when deciding on EULAs and the initial price.