I don’t know much about the pros Vs cons of woods Vs housing, but I do know that the woods are in an area of the UK where badger culling (ostensibly to reduce levels of bovine TB) is common, and also that the land used to be agricultural. May has a history of campaigning to prevent the killing of British wildlife such as hedgehogs, foxes, badgers and more.

Badgers are especially relevant in this context. They are carriers but bovine-TB is always present in the environment. Whilst there can be transmission between badgers and cows, the majority of cases in farmed cattle are cattle-cattle transmission. Badger culling has not been shown to be necessary or useful in reducing outbreaks of bovine-TB. A better solution is more eyes on agriculture.

I don’t know more specifics of this forest, but I’m inclined to take a favourable view of the project in this case, especially as the pro-culling rhetoric around Badger culling irks me. I’m also vaguely aware of a bunch of reforestation projects in the UK and this seems like a sensible place for a forest (with the caveat that I’m a biochemist with only a superficial knowledge of what’s going on in ecological activism in the UK atm)