Other differentiated opinions wanted:
A friend showed me this and treats it like a prophecy. I’m rather skeptical. To me seems like somebody tries to fuel the AI hype with this text or is completely drunk with AI. It also fuels the China-US who-is-better-fight and the authors thoughts seem to circle too much around the US president, IMO.
But I don’t understand much of this machine-learning stuff. So maybe it’s me being ignorant. Still, to me reads like science fiction. How about you?
Until people show their locked in, long term holdings on AI it’s all talk. Their job and portfolio better be AI.
Until AI isn’t a hallucinating, corpo-safe retard it’s all hype.
We want Jarvis. We will be fine with something that is consistently, factually correct and lets us deep dive like Wikipedia to inspect sources.
I think a part of the problem with current AI is that it’s trying to be an expert on all things. Humans can have similar issues, were they are legitimately an expert in one field and makes them over confident in other areas. So current AI is a better bit then a newb at lots of things and over confident. Haveing models with more focused training would improve how useful they are.
Like your example, it would be great to have an AI that is focused on how to do good research and doesn’t try to be an “expert” on anything else.