welcome to the second-ever Beehaw Community Survey. it’s been awhile because of everything going on; we last did one of these with the influx of people last June and we got 1,500 responses that time. we don’t expect anywhere near that many this time, but that’s fine.

this survey should take about 10 minutes to fill out, so we strongly encourage you to do so when you are able to. you can find it at the following link:

Beehaw Community Survey #2


the survey is comprised of eight optional demographic questions to help us assess the overall identity of our community and eight questions relating to Beehaw and the Fediverse. the survey will be open for at least three days but no longer than one week. it’ll be locally pinned for the duration of that minimum three days, so please mind that. results will also be aggregated and posted on here/the Docs page in a summary like with the last survey. no ETA on that.


this is also a good time to remind everyone that Beehaw has moved over to Open Collective Europe Foundation, and we will be taking all donations from there going forward. please direct your donations there if you haven’t switched from our old Open Collective Foundation page yet!

  • jarfil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Beehaw needed to:

    • stop some messages
    • didn’t need to stop communities
    • maybe curate its “All” feed

    …the only mod tool available, was defederation. This is a clear shortcoming of the tools, which right now only allow an “all or nothing” approach, not of the federation itself.

    instance-level filtering is what gives an instance its unique look-and-feel

    Not exactly; the rules and community of an instance, are what give that “unique look-and-feel”.

    In an alternative reality, with a slightly different approach to federation, an “instance” could be a curated preset the user imports into their client.

    Actually, that could be done with the Fediverse, if someone decided to do it.