• Alaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Therefore we need to cut all non-essential government spending, for example everything that isn’t defense spending, and reallocate it to defense spending so we can overwhelm China’s defenses with wave attacks of billions of big beautiful boats that cost billions to build and only a million to sink

  • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Lol sounds like he’s doing a great job in his role checks notes in charge of US defense.

  • Quilotoa@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Rule 1. When you’re having political problems at home, create a foreign enemy to distract the population.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Lots of comments that “this is a false distraction to justify war on Panama”. War on Panama is about interdicting Chinese commerce with Brazil and other countries south of US. Including FDI in Panama to boost its cross ocean trade volume through a railway.

    This is more of a classified leak exposing US weakness and impotence. This does compromise stupid people’s faith in US protections across the world, and their rulers corrupt submission to US under propaganda of US protection.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Apparently the crucial moment for the US to attack was a few year ago, when they still had naval superiority. They missed their window luckily for us. Thanks to the PRC the US doesn’t get to use SE Asia and Europe as their cannon fodder.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I remember how they bragged that the operation against Yemen was the biggest naval operation since WW2.

      And they lost that, against country having no navy and no airforce.

  • Inucune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    …and the US could make a China shaped nuclear crater to the west of Taiwan. Then everyone clapped.

    “Bro, what if…”

    • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      “Well we could immediately escalate any conflict to end human civilization” is not the boast you think it is.

      Look at the current war in Ukraine – the closest we’ve come to direct conflict between two nuclear superpowers. Nukes are useful only to the extent they make the other side think twice about a large, conventional invasion. If you actually use them against someone who can retaliate, you lose.

    • IttihadChe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Could they though? You think China would just sit around and let the U.S fire nuclear missiles at them without intercepting them and firing their own? Why are you so sure that wouldn’t just end up with a U.S sized crater north of Mexico?

      Also, dismissing any predictive situation as some crazy out there “what if” is hilarious.

      War games are an extremely important part of any strategy so that you don’t just walk right into an easily predictable slaughter because you “don’t care about what ifs”.