• BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Far left is no landlords really. Like maybe small scale for like older people who prefer not to own condos and do any maintenance in elderly years, or students or people temporarily in another country or something, but no massive bloated greedy parasites like now.

    • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, but there is the authoritarian state owned housing way and the anarchist housing cooperative way. Political science isn’t linear.

    • CCF_100@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      How would apartments work, ideally? I guess have a contract where everyone living in the apartments owns a percentage of the building, and therefore the community of people that live there are responsible for building maintenance and other stuff like that, right?

      • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You just described a housing cooperative. This form of collective ownership aligns owner and renter/home owner stakeholders as the same person and is a special form of consumer cooperative. Housing cooperatives are especially prevalent in the nordic countries. They keep prices down as they aren’t owned by shareholders who want continuous profit. The problem with this style of firm is that they tend to dissolve after the tenets collectively pay off the property and seek to sell rather than maintain or expand the cöop. This occured after world war 2 in France as a bunch of post war building were quickly built and the coops that built them were dissolved.

      • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I feel like this is easy to answer and I’m not sure why the question comes up so often.

        People have jobs and get payed salaries to both build and maintain houses/apartments. Rent payments would go to pay the actual people that did the building / do the maintenance. Nobody makes profit off this. No landlord, no investor, no profit. The money goes to cover building costs, then maintenance. Easy peasy.

        We have things like this. People build and maintain our public roads, schools, water/sewer systems, fire departments, military, etc.

        No profits. No landlord gets free money for renting. No wallstreet investor gets free money for selling at high market values, etc.

        Obviously, decisions have to be made about supply/demand, areas where lots of people want to live and all that. So what? Let’s make those decisions intelligently instead of greed and profit driven.