This has happened once before and they reversed it. But they said this last time too:

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

https://lemmy.world/post/3234363

  • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    You seem to be confusing Lemmy.world with Lemmy as a whole. Lemmy is free to be used for anything by anyone.

    Lemmy.world is the largest and most mainstream Lemmy server, so they need to be especially careful about legal issues. If lemmy.world gets taken down due to mirroring content hosted on lemmy.dbzer0.com, the whole network would partially collapse because of how many users and communities are hosted on lemmy.world.

    It’s not even close to worth the risk. This is how federation is supposed to work.

      • Blaze@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It definitely has. Hopefully this decision will nudge people into other instances.

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s definitely not ideal to be this centralized around lemmy.world. But it’s also nearly impossible to prevent some amount of centralization, especially at our current size. With only 50k active users, we don’t have enough people to sustain activity if things were more spread out.

        It’s still so early. If we get to 500k or 5M users, things will naturally get way more decentralized. A year ago, about 70-80% of the whole network was basically centralized on lemmy.ml. I dont have the exact numbers because I wasn’t here yet, but looking back at the stats there were only a few thousand active users at that time and the vast majority were on lemmy.ml

        Now, only about 40% of the network is on lemmy.world (20k/50k users). I just think there are natural incentives that will continue to push us in the direction of decentralization, but we haven’t quite reached the tipping point where that starts to happen.

    • Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s honestly a bit pathetic that your admin didn’t have the guts to actually ask the lemmy.world user base before banning us for the second time, even though your instance promised to consult it’s user base before doing anything like this again. “Facilitation of piracy” is not even illegal in most jurisdictions, because it’s so vague. I mean the internet itself facilitates piracy. It’s only hosting pirated content that is technically illegal, and we don’t do that. We just talk about the topic. Talking about piracy ≠ hosting pirated content.

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not from lemmy.world, I’m from sh.itjust.works. We have never banned you at all. And I understand your argument.

        But it’s not our place to decide what the lemmy.world admins do with their server. It also doesn’t affect you personally at all. It’s not like they defederated your server, it only affects their users who were subscribed to that community, and they can always just make an account on another server.