I’ve seen much ado about what happens if Trump wins, and those points are especially valid. But at the same time, I don’t know if I can accept that you can brazenly fund and support genocide and receive my vote.
If you don’t believe there is a genocide in Gaza then good for you. This post isnt meant for you and I’m not interested in debating that point today.
Similarly, at least for myself, the answer of “what happens if Trump becomes president” isn’t the point here. I’m not saying that I’m not considering the impact of a Trump presidency, but i think it’s really important to answer what the world would look like after four more years of Biden.
-
What happens in Gaza when Biden gets another term? He has lately taken some, IMO, token efforts to curb the genocide. But this is the best he’s done, and only after voter pressure. What happens when he’s no longer subject to pressure from voters like that? I cannot see it getting better.
-
In the linked video, Burnie talks about workers rights, and I agree again that Trump would be worse. But Biden isn’t a progressive icon. Practically speaking, if he gets another term, I simply don’t see him moving the needle whatsoever on the rights and lives of small workers. I concede that he showed up to a UAW strike, but that cost him nothing. When the rail workers were striking, and his support would have actually taken literally any sacrifice, Biden chose to end it through legislative action.
-
The environment was the thing in Burnie’s video which actually has me reconsidering. But I just can’t see Biden meaningfully curbing emissions. Not domestically, nor globally at the expense of diplomatic capital. It would be different here if I thought there was meaningful down ballot optimism. But, IMO, were going to lose the Senate and won’t reclaim the House. So if Biden gets his second term, he’s not going to have the power to take action on the environment. And so again I’d ask, what really happens if he gets to a second term? Another 4 years of inaction is too late. And worse, I wonder if he’s going to damage the democratic party while in office bad enough we’ll never have the chance again.
-
It’s going to come up, and I’m not opposed to considering novel opinions here. A vote for a 3rd party is a vote for the opponent. Everyone says this. I simply do not buy it. Trump says it. Biden says it. Does that mean I’m voting for both of them? Are they lying? Because right now what I see is a vote for either of them is a vote in support of genocide.
I’m so sick of this discussion. Your opinions and feelings don’t matter. The reality is you have a binary choice. Do you want A or do you want B? That’s the reality.
Regarding Gaza, do you want A) the current genocide, or B) a much bigger one? If you vote for a third party, you’re tipping the result towards B, because you were never voting for B in the first place.
Instead of voting for A, perhaps you could think of it as voting against B? Because those are the only two possible outcomes. Pick one.
I honestly think people left of center have lost their minds with this stuff.
despite all of the postering and hand wringing on lemmy, I dont think this is broadly true. in this insane moment, any still sane individual can see a demonstrable difference between the two candidates being shoved down our throats and, once again, hold their nose and pick the lesser of two evils in a national election.
with luck the orange clusterfuck remains out of office, and perhaps this country may finally have develped the maturity for a national conversation about (and push for) ranked choice voting - in spite of ruling class wishes.
We have this in Maine and fucking love it!
It’s so good! I’d love to see our neighboring states make the move to it or STAR voting
I think the actual human people on Lemmy have their minds very much on-point about this stuff.
There are a handful of very vocal accounts who are saying a particular way to look at Biden that makes absolutely no sense if you examine it for 2 seconds, but they all behave in a particular type of way that isn’t really consistent with how people who genuinely believe things (whether right or wrong) behave.
Trump having a second term is not, like, an ambiguous or borderline situation. I think the number of actual human Lemmy people who are at all confused about the results of voting for Trump vs. voting for Biden vs. not voting is very small.
You wonder how real some of these people are. They make a few topics the main reason to oppose Biden, but excuse them for any other politician, especially ones that will make it even worse. They always come off as non-American agitators. Many of which seem to be just Russian actors on top of that.
It’s worse than that. I have no idea why it’s apparently important enough to me for me to want to investigate as much as I have, but just from the last few days:
I have a bunch more examples. But generally they are articulate and on-the-surface sensible when spouting one of a handful of talking points in a variety of different contexts and with different decoration around them, but anything outside that, they react like no human being I’ve ever had a conversation with.
Which is why many of them probably aren’t. They’re agitators from outside the US. At best, very poorly informed people from other countries with some obsession with US politics. At worst, people intending to spread misinformation.
I just want to ask the question, will Biden actually improve things once he isn’t worried about burning the good will of voters? Can we only ever vote for genocide, or genocide with an apology tacked on to the end of it?