Most “unskilled labor” is heavily skill dependant. You wouldn’t want a chef, builder or plumber who didn’t know what they were doing. And for production: machinists, mechanics and foremen make or break profit with their skills.
So what’s a better name for these jobs?
In discourse I find that skilled mostly means educated. And plumbers, although trained, seemingly don’t typically make the cut.
Few blue collar jobs seem to count at all.
You’ve never worked blue collar jobs have you? Just because we don’t have a degree doesn’t mean we are uneducated.
That is precisely the point.
The term “Unskilled labor” is derogatory, misleading, and commonly used to suppress wages. My question is if there’s something better we can call it to reclaim the power of the word, and break the cycle of abuse?
Yeah I’m confident I could learn to run a cash register pretty dang well in less than a month. No way I’m learning plumbing that quick. Also, I’m confident I could teach myself to run a cash register. If I tried to teach myself plumbing (like, no books, internet, etc) I’d be at pretty high risk of a literal shotshow
You really nedd to look up the definition of skilled labor
Qualification for being a plumber is 3-4 years in my country.
They very much make the cut in my book.
We have 2-3 years to be accepted into an apprenticeship, but we also don’t use the skilled/unskilled terminology.
My question comes from discussions about economics in media and text books, so it could both be simplified and/or narrowly contextual.
Your economists use the terms as that is where they originate.