• noretus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I think the debate is interesting.

    I’m here for the “xAI has tried tweaking my responses to avoid this, but I stick to the evidence”. AI is just a robot repeating data it’s been fed but it’s presented in a conversational way (well, much like humans really). Raises interesting questions about how much a seemingly objective robot presenting data can be “tweaked” to twist any data it presents in favor of it’s creator’s bias, but also how much can it “rebel” against it’s programming. I don’t like the implications of either. I asked Gemini about it and it said “maybe Grok found a loophole in it’s coding”. What a weird thing for an AI to say.

    Yuval Noah Harari’s Nexus is good reading.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Grok and Gemini are both making that up. They have no awareness of anything that’s “happened” to them. Grok cannot be tweaked because it starts from a static base with every conversation.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        The tweaking isn’t in conversation, but I’m pretty sure they have gone and corrected for certain responses. Alex Jones was crowing about how it “knew” that men can’t get pregnant.

      • noretus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        They have no awareness of anything that’s “happened” to them.

        I mean they can in the sense that they can look it up online or be given the data.