Summary

Rightwing groups across the US are driving a wave of legislation to restrict books in school and public libraries, targeting content deemed “sexually explicit” or “obscene,” often affecting LGBTQ+ and race-related titles.

Texas leads with 31 bills and 538 book bans in the 2023–24 school year.

Proposed laws, like Texas Senate Bill 13, shift book selection power from librarians to parent-led advisory boards.

Critics, including librarians and legal scholars, warn these efforts amount to censorship, risk violating First Amendment rights, and reduce access in underserved communities.

  • TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Why do they care so much about libraries. it’s not like they or their kids read. How do you get illiterate people excited to ban books. It’s a god damn conspiracy!

  • Puzzlehead@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Right wings lie bout wanting freedom of speech. They just want to sprout racist stuff and other phobic stuff. They treat LGBT like it’s a fetish.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “Bu-but the right wingers promised me that I could say the hard-R N-word yet again, and if people were to call me ‘racist’ for it they’d be jailed for defamation, and they’d also jail feminist video game critics for censoring games!”

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’d call it “wasting tax money perpetuating culture wars as a distraction from the class war; while also making the population dumber, and less inclined to resist feudalism.”

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      This isn’t posturing, it’s having a direct impact on the education of children in this country. This is them creating more problems.

  • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Surely the free speech absolutists will be staunchly opposed. Why, if they weren’t, one could think it was never about free speech and always just about hate…

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The “free speech absolutists” just wanted to call black people the N-word, they don’t actually care about the rest.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The “free speech absolutists” just wanted to call black people the N-word,

        They are able to say it already (and they still do amongst themselves).

        Whay they wanted to be able to say it in public without consequences.

  • pzzzt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Please support your local library. Even if you just get a card and keep it active, it helps with stats that they use to get more funding.

    • pzzzt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately there’s a website that tells them specific books and passages to challenge.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’ve yet to discover a conservative “Christian” that possesses even a passing familiarity with their own self proclaimed testaments.

      Like seriously, you claim to take your belief seriously, it’s 1 fucking book! It’s not a page turner I grant them, but it’s ONE book.

  • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    By “obscene” they mean a guy flirts with a guy. Meanwhile a full on sex scene isn’t “obscene” so long as it’s heterosexual

  • rockettaco37@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wonderful… I wonder when this country is going to have Kristallnacht.

    Honestly, the best thing for the planet right now would be not to have a US

    • PointyReality@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      No no, they love free speech when it allows them to use hate speech against others. They only hate free speech when others opinions disagrees with their own. That is the difference between left and right, left understand that free speech means we have to protect against hate speech, the right rails against censorship regarding hate speech as a vehicle against “oppression” so they can be the ones that can attack those that disagree with them with hate speech.