• Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Epic takes less revenue than Steam.

    They both have anti-competitive practices. They’re just different practices. Epic tends to favor helping developers and Valve tends to favor appealing to users. Valve doesn’t need to force exclusivity because games have to take a loss to not use them, because they’re already the market leader. There’s no knowing what Valve would be doing if they were the underdog, but people need to stop assuming Valve is good. No company is ever good.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      No company is good but that doesn’t mean they are all equally, identically bad.

      We have seen what Valve did when it was not the market leader because it didn’t spawn in such a place. What they did is lock their own games to their own platform, which is something most other PC storefronts do or did at some point.

      We did not yet see what Epic would do if it would got to the top. Is it even guaranteed that they would continue to take less revenue?

      And really, if all companies are bad, what’s the point of rooting for Epic to overtake Steam?

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not rooting for epic to overtake steam. I’m just against the people who hate Epic just for the sake of hating Epic. It’s cool to hate them I guess, but it doesn’t usually make sense. The biggest real issue is their store client sucks, but Steam wasn’t always as good as it is now either.