It was a many months transition, and it’s finally done

Fun thing, you can actually make a backup of all* your messages, groups, contacts, etc. So before leaving you can have all of your data in case you need that one contact or something

The final red flag was as that allegedly Russian authorities were messing with people’s deleted messages. Not for the first time there are news that they could read, modify, delete, see location, and etc. Screw it, this is unsafe, I’m out.

Also, these days telegram is really at the state of a pile of garbage, bloated, buggy, and shady messenger.

  • Titou@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You forget to mention they gave informations to german police, seems like they forget the point of the app

    • Yamayo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Stop it with the creative commons link in your comments.

      Also, there is nothing wrong with Telegram logins or new accounts.

        • Yamayo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get notifications of new contacts that join Telegram so it does. I don’t need to try it myself.

          And I don’t understand your cc link and your down votes speak for themselves so stop the silliness.

          • onlinepersona@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            And I don’t understand your cc link and your down votes speak for themselves so stop the silliness.

            Do you fear what you don’t understand? “I don’t understand it, so stop”.

            And I don’t care about downvotes. Go on, downvote. It has no real life effect.

            CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • Kiryu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why did Telegram get so popular in the privacy scene compared to Signal in the first place? To my knowledge Signal came out first and never had a history of breaches or leaks.

    • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Telegram came out a year earlier in that signal, and because immediately popular amongst young people and drug dealers in Russia

    • Quintus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can’t speak for the privacy scene but in my country it’s pretty popular merely because of anonimity (which boils down to not having to use a phone number) and Discord-like server/groups. For porn and other NSFW content, it is pretty popular.

    • catculation@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Telegram got its popularity because of piracy and having your chats on cloud. It was never intended to give privacy to user but due to WhatsApp breaches they started promoting telegram as a secured chat app which is a toatal joke till this day.

    • rdri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Maybe because it offers public chats and channels? Something other apps lack.

      Also the best desktop experience out of all apps I’ve tried.

    • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, UI and PC client experience.

      I find the UI in signal a bit off putting. Telegram grabs you with their funky stickers, clean UI and dumb features. I alps hate that Signal won’t bother copying the messages to a new client… Like, I have a 1Gbps connection, surely we can copy my chat histories from my phone to my PC? Nope, gotta start fresh on every new client…

      If they did less dumb shit like adding statuses, and put some more effort into making the UI nice, more people would use it.

      And I get these are dumb reasons, but they’re real none the less

      • Scirocco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think Signal shot themselves squarely in the dick by removing SMS functionality.

        Previously, you could use Signal as the primary SMS/messenger app. Any conversations with other Signal clients secure. Conversations in SMS/MMS? Marked as not-secure.

        But, out of some purity concerns, SMS functionality was removed and the dev team focused on adding useless shit like “stickers” and then the pin-code harassment.

        Signal adoption plummeted as intended (?)

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      By lying aggressively.

      Lying about being the first phone app with E2EE (they’re not even close, by over a decade if we count J2ME apps) because Signal was called TextSecure back when telegram didn’t even exist yet. Lying about their protocol, lying about their backup system (if you’re using group chats or regular chats which are backed up they are visible to the admins and any other claim is a lie), bullshit propaganda against Signal, etc…

      Oh and by the way, Signal has now finally launched usernames, so you don’t have to share your phone number to use it anymore.

    • ccx@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly it was mostly a Discord competitor if anything. One with FOSS clients for desktop and Android.

      The private chat is baseline implementation just to tick a box rather than anything practically useful.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Telegram, while often hyped as high privacy/security got popular because it was/is fully featured and isn’t Google or Facebook. That’s it

      It’s less invasive, less annoying, and can do all the stuff like gifs and stickers. So it was very easy to get people onto compared to pretty much anything that was actually private or secure.

      Once enough people started using it, it snowballed into its own monolith of bloat.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was also very fast and transparent – not a lot of stuff separating somebody from the other people in their conversations, which was pretty solid even compared to other messaging apps of its day. Most people didn’t feel the need to fact-check its privacy and security claims because it worked good enough for them!

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s popular with furries because of sticker support. Furries are an anchor population for the larger world of IT/etc. It was never really about privacy, or signal would have taken off.

    • spaduf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think the big reason that nobody’s mentioned yet is simply that they were earlier. Back when projects like Tox and Matrix were first starting to pop up, telegram was already fully formed. Signal didn’t come until at least a year later and didn’t have feature parity until several years later. Telegram by contrast was a much closer experience to WhatsApp and Messenger, making the transition much easier, particularly for low-tech knowledge users.

      • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        in some circles yeah.

        In Germany it actually became famous because it allowed for huge groups and it’s where covid misinformation breeding grounds took off. People thought you were a nutjob if you had telegram lol.

        Which, while that is the dumbest reason to reject a chat app, at least meant that Signal was able to get more popular with uhhh smarter folks.

    • ritchie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is not considered a good alternative as a messaging app for privacy folks and because the source code is not open, it is not E2E encrypted by default (you need to start a secret chat or something to make your conversation encrypted) if I remember correctly.

      • ris@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You remember incorrect. All Clients are open source:

        Telegram apps are open source and support reproducible builds. Anyone can independently verify that Telegram apps you download from App Store or Google Play were built using the exact same code that we publish

        In Fdroid there are also forks. But yes, their servers are closed source and centralized.

        Still its not recommended. It requires Phone number and as you said its E2ee is not on by default and is not soooo good.

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The final red flag was as that allegedly Russian authorities were messing with people’s deleted messages.

    I don’t know about “Russian authorities”, but the fact remains that if you can login anywhere and see your messages, then your public key is stored in the server.

    Since Telegram requires authorization from an extant connection, I don’t know if that means your public key isn’t stored on the servers and it’s being sent from the authorizing device, or if that device is merely authorizing the Telegram servers to transmit that key to the new device.

    Since they have a full e2e chat feature (Private Chats), I’m going to assume the latter.

    So anyone who can get those keys can gain access to your chats.

    I still say Telegram is far superior to anything from Fuckbook/Meta, because it’s not integrated into everying you do (even those of us who’ve never once been on Facebook, and yet have ghost profiles), not to mention the Facebook app integrated into Android on many vendor phones.

    Even so, know Telegram for what it is - not ideal, just better than WhatsApp, and a step along the path to moving to more secure and privacy-respecting apps.l

    • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Comparing telegram to WhatsApp is something really 2015 😅

      Now we have many alternatives, and let’s just switch, fb and telegram both suck compared to signal, simplex, session, or even matrix (wait for the new matrix’ update where they add some new encryption stuff)

      • Vilian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        i use telegram, but i agree that signal and matrix is superior from both(i don’t about the others)

      • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Session was at first a fork of Signal without usernames.

        Now by design it uses their own custom tor-like service (instead of just… using tor) and does not support forward secrecy or deniable authentication, so anyone who collects the messages in transit can either find a vulnerability in the encryption scheme, or spend enough GPU resources to crack it, and they have confirmation of who sent and received the message and what the contents of the message are. And is headquartered in Australia, which is 5EYES and much more against encryption than the US. Oh, and the server is closed-source.

        Regarding Australia’s 2018 bill…

        The Australian Parliament passed a contentious encryption bill on Thursday to require technology companies to provide law enforcement and security agencies with access to encrypted communications. Privacy advocates, technology companies and other businesses had strongly opposed the bill, but Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s government said it was needed to thwart criminals and terrorists who use encrypted messaging programs to communicate.

        Regarding the ‘vulnerability or cracking them later’ bit…

        Messages that are sent to you are actually sent to your swarm. The messages are temporarily stored on multiple Service Nodes within the swarm to provide redundancy. Once your device picks up the messages from the swarm, they are automatically deleted from the Service Nodes that were temporarily storing them.

        From Session’s own FAQ:

        Session clients do not act as nodes on the network, and do not relay or store messages for the network. Session’s network architecture is closer to a client-server model, where the Session application acts as the client and the Service Node swarm acts as the server. Session’s client-server architecture allows for easier asynchronous messaging (messaging when one party is offline) and onion routing-based IP address obfuscation, relative to peer-to-peer network architectures.

        I wouldn’t touch it with a 12ft ladder.

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Between forking Signal to make their desktop and mobile clients, and forking Monero to make their cryptocurrency… I’m surprised they came up with Lokinet.

          Edit: I’m pretty Session doesn’t even use Lokinet. So much for the claimed resiliency from “hackers”

          • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Session does use the Oxen network which is the renamed Lokinet, unless they made a change I’m wholly unaware of.

            • LWD@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I must have been thinking of their past implementations. Their FAQ says things were different:

              Proxy routing was an interim routing solution which Session used at launch while we worked to implement onion requests. When proxy routing was in use, instead of connecting directly to an Oxen Service Node to send or receive messages, Session clients connected to a service node which then connects to a second service node on behalf of the Session client… The proxy routing system has now been replaced by onion requests.

              It was even less clear to me because this is what it says in the app itself:

              Session hides your IP by bouncing your messages through several Service Nodes in Session’s decentralized network.

              Not “the Oxen network” but “Session’s network.”

              And then it has a graph of

              • You

              • Entry Node

              • Service Node

              • Service Node

              • Destination

              • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re not wrong. Lokinet and Session are both products from the same parent company. Lokinet was renamed to the Oxen protocol, and they run all the servers AFAIK, so it would be like tor, if tor ran every guard, entry, and exit node. AKA worthless. So you’re spot on, it’s a joy to the intelligence community and after the Encrochat debacle and Session stopped using Signal’s encryption algorithms and code, I would suggest no one use it for anything sensitive.

  • progettarsi@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    tg premium user here, WTF? i tought telegram was privacy respectfull and pretty secure, what changed/happened? that’s not the first post i saw abt It. also, any alternatives? with almost same features and as many channels/groups as telegram ofc like don’t suggest me signal or Matrix nobody Is on that platforms…

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Telegram hasn’t been secure since basically day 1. IIRC it went something like

      Security experts: Never roll your own cryptography.
      Telegram: We rolled our own cryptography!
      Security experts: Don’t. And it’s broken.
      Telegram: uhhhh… We fixed it.
      Security experts: It still looks really bad. Stop it.
      Telegram: says nothing

      • myplacedk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Security is a spectrum. Telegram has never been the most secure alternative, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have any security.

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          From my first link

          The safest way to use Telegram would be not to. However, if you have no other choice, the best approach would be to use a clean burner phone to communicate with another clean burner phone. Change them regularly.

          In short, for better protection, use anything else.

      • progettarsi@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        ye it’s like a social media that doesn’t spy on me and doesn’t have strange algos to feed me with shit. never used It as a chatting app

    • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do what I did. Let everyone you care about on TG that you’re closing that crap, with your reasons for doing so. Inform them of your moving to signal, session, whatever. Be clear that, otherwise, they can try calling you and wish them good luck. Close TG on the day you set as deadline. I did that and whomever didn’t get a Signal or Session account has to call me. I’ve never looked back.

      • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like that, also, a few months prior to the deletion turn off the notifications, and come there every few days, so people need to wait for your reply for days, and when you come you say “oh, I’m not using tg, I switched to signal/session/simplex/bird mail”

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          These are allngreat suggestions. Another huge advantage is that this help detoxify from the constant pinging with others.

      • Delusion6903@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        My family is all on iMessage. I told them if they didn’t install Signal I wouldn’t reply to their texts.

        At first, whenever they texted I would just reply with something that looked automated like “This user is no longer available via text message. Please install Signal if you wish to communicate.”

    • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      One day I said that in the future I will only be available via Signal. If not there then there is still SMS. And so far everyone I have contact with regularly installed it eventually.

    • burrito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Keep bugging them. I almost exclusively use signal for messaging these days and it’s fantastic. It took longer to convince some people than others

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Install a family XMPP server like Snikket or otherwise. Show them the benchmarks of how little battery & data plan drain is used from Conversations forks. Explain how bloated Electron apps are & how you don’t wish that on your loved ones vs. Dino, Gajim, or a TUI client. Sidecar a Movim server so y’all can share long-lived, non-ephemeral posts instead of losing memories like photos in some long group thread. Let them know their data is safe with you as the operator instead of some massive for-profit corporation—and if they don’t trust you, they are empowered to start their own server to interop.

      (This tactic has yet to work for me, but I will keep running into that wall til it breaks 😃)

    • Scirocco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Easy! Just replace their usual SMS app with Signal, and then every contact they have that does use Signal is private and secure!

      Oh. Wait. That’s exactly the functionality that Signal removed in their effort to ensure that Signal is never widely adopted…

      • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I didn’t agree with their decision at all at the time, but now that I realize they made it a little while after it gained widespread adoption and people stopped using it because “Signal isn’t actually secure!” … seems like people were expecting a secure messenger to be, well, secure. So they would chat about anything and everything thinking “I am using a secure messenger, these messages can’t be read…” and tech ignorance is a dangerous thing if you’re trying to be secure. I would’ve preferred a colored window and un-closable message for SMS chats, but oh well. I like that they’ve introduced usernames so you don’t have to give out your real number.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The final red flag was as that allegedly Russian authorities were messing with people’s deleted messages

    I’m gonna need a source on that, since the creator himself was persecuted and telegram had layers of fake companies to stop Putin from getting to it.

    • SevenOfWine@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Here’s what I found:

      Over the past year, numerous dissidents across Russia have found their Telegram accounts seemingly monitored or compromised. Hundreds have had their Telegram activity wielded against them in criminal cases. Perhaps most disturbingly, some activists have found their “secret chats”—Telegram’s purportedly ironclad, end-to-end encrypted feature—behaving strangely, in ways that suggest an unwelcome third party might be eavesdropping. These cases have set off a swirl of conspiracy theories, paranoia, and speculation among dissidents, whose trust in Telegram has plummeted. In many cases, it’s impossible to tell what’s really happening to people’s accounts—whether spyware or Kremlin informants have been used to break in, through no particular fault of the company; whether Telegram really is cooperating with Moscow; or whether it’s such an inherently unsafe platform that the latter is merely what appears to be going on. … Elies Campo, who says he directed Telegram’s growth, business, and partnerships for several years, confirmed this general characterization to WIRED, as did a former Telegram developer. In other words, Telegram has the capacity to share nearly any confidential information a government requests. Users just have to trust that it won’t.

      https://www.wired.com/story/the-kremlin-has-entered-the-chat/

    • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depends what people

      For family and friends I have nextcloud, many of them are using it (yes, i’m that one out of a million people who made their friends and family use selfhosted stuff and be happy)

  • airikr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I must agree on the bloated part. Telegram was awesome before Pavel got greedy and added more and more stuff that are just not related to any chat service, for an example payments and crypto.

    I installed Snikket on my server few weeks ago and are now trying to move everyone to it. It seems to be a very slow process, though.

    But I might keep Telegram only for the porn channels. Mighty good stuff!

    By the way. Do you have the source for your claim that Russian authorities were messing with people’s deleted messages?

    • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, yeah, the porn channels are really good indeed

      I’m thinking if I can access them from some telegram channel mirror

      • airikr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, Telegram already have a preview feature for every public channels. Just copy the direct link to the channel and add /s after t.me/ (or choose “Previous channel” without opening the link in Telegram) and you’re good to go. If only Pavel will add an RSS feed to that feed. That would be mighty-mighty awesome!

        More work to save the media files, though. You have to inspect the element and get the direct link to the image through background-image for the class tgme_widget_message_photo_wrap. Much easier and takes less time to just save it inside Telegram, as of now.