Ahoy mateys, it’s time to setup Jellyfin if you prefer not to pay for the privilege of self-hosting your own content.

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/27204525

We are also changing how remote playback works for streaming personal media (that is, playback when not on the same local network as the server). The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature. This—alongside the new Plex Pass pricing—will help provide those resources. This change will apply to the future release of our new Plex experience for mobile and other platforms.

  • land@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was about to get a Plex Pass, but I saw this news today.

    • Yeldarb12@toast.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you were going to get the lifetime pass before the price increase then I’d say to still go for it. Personal opinion

      My brother doesn’t have Plex pass but I do, so he will still be able to watch stuff from my library for free.

      • land@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Might have to pull the trigger. I’m really enjoying plex. I’ve used Jellyfin in the past, but it’s not as polished as Plex. However, the plug-and-play remote access feature on Plex is a big plus. I’ll still use Jellyfin alongside Plex.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          And if you buy the lifetime now, you might actually get it on sale. Just create an account and wait a few days, usually you get a sale offer

  • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Does anyone have any helpful guides on setting up jellyfin with a certificate so they can privately host it while also keeping it secure and up to date? I think if using docker it would make sense to use compose and configure traeffic proxy and use let’s encrypt for certificates.

    Plex takes care of this for you with their cert and authentication systems. I feel like if user management and secure authentication is easy to set up then that is the primary reason to leave Plex. If I can just hand out accounts to anyone whom I would like to access my instance with ease then my family members could easily access it.

    If one was to host from the home, using something like tailscale to host it online with forwarding a port would also be ideal.

    • Nora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Look into a thing called Caddy. It can do a few things but it makes certificates super easy. You will likely need to buy a domain tho. They can be cheap if you don’t care what its called.

    • Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Does anyone have any helpful guides on setting up jellyfin with a certificate so they can privately host it while also keeping it secure and up to date?

      You can expose jellyfin via a reverse_proxy like caddy2, godoxy, ssl-proxy, or you can use something like lego to directly manage your certificates without the proxy. Lego is great because it works with dozens of dns providers, even cloudflare.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature.

    What “resources” do you need, exactly, to allow my friends to stream from my server?

    • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      As long as you have Plex pass it’s all good and nothing changes. That said, this was exactly my reaction. Plex expends exactly zero fucking resources for my server, so wtf is this shit supposed to mean?

      • kieron115@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m pretty sure that’s corporate speak for “we need to drive plex pass subscriptions more so we need to lock more feature behind it.”

        • skankhunt42@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          This is 100% my opinion too.

          I’m annoyed that I supported them and got a lifetime account on sale. At the same time I’m happy that I can take my time testing and moving my family and friends over to something else.

    • Carrot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Developers to keep things up to date and secure. Which I wouldn’t mind paying for, but instead they spend it all on making Plex a social media that emails your friends a list of shows you watch? I can tell you right now that other than “watch together” no one is using the Plex social features on purpose

        • uxellodunum@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Just to make it clear to any other people reading this, Jellyfin has Group Sync where you can create groups with participants and syncplay media.

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          they never said they needed resources for the remote playback… they said that they needed more resources - ie money to develop the software in general, and this are feature gating a useful feature to try and convince people to pay

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            they never said they needed resources for the remote playback…

            That’s exactly what it sounds like to me…

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              that’s fine… but it’s not necessarily what it says. it’s ambiguous at best, but if they’d meant they need you to pay them for resources then theyd probably say it more outright

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Their revenue stream is based on license fees for the software? So if they want to keep the lights on they need money

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Okay so you agree it’s nothing to do with “resources” and everything to do with locking features behind paywalls to drive up revenue?

            • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              developers are a “resource” and they need to be paid. Do you want to keep getting updates for your server? Someone needs to do that and that someone wants to be paid in this case

  • Yeldarb12@toast.ooo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    From what the site says it’s just putting more stuff behind a paywall due to rising costs. That paywall is a subscription or the lifetime pass from what I can tell.

    Since I got the lifetime pass a while back and host my own server, my brother should still be able to watch stuff in my library from his house. I also travel a lot so I’m going to be pissed if that’s not the case.

    When I chose to use Plex initially it just fit better with what I needed. I can change to something else if I need to but it sounds like my lifetime pass means not much is going to change for me.

    • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you have Plex pass, this does not effect anyone using your server.

      It’s still a shit asshole move by them, but at least it isn’t catastrophic. Hopefully by the time Plex starts to suck jellyfin will not blow chunks.

  • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Was a little worried from the headline that it was being moved to another subscription tier.

    I’ve owned a Plex Pass Lifetime subscription since it’s basically been available. I’ve honestly forgotten Remote Streaming was a free service at this point.

  • ZebrasRcool@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So I’ve currently got a yearly Plex Pass, because I didn’t want to get locked into Plex or feel any pressure to stay if they went down the dunny, but have been putting off migrating to JellyFin. For anybody who has, how did you find the process?

    My media isn’t named the most sensibly. I just keep whatever name it came with for the most part. I also liked how Plex just handled the authentication and remote streaming for me - at no stage did I have to open up a port on my router, setup a reverse proxy, etc. Can I migrate my watch history?

    I’m fairly new to this. Any migration advice or thoughts would be appreciated!

    E: only me, though I stream things externally while out of the house fairly regularly. I’m tech literate enough to follow a readme and read docs, but that’s about it. I don’t need to worry about other, less tech savvy, users streaming my library

    • rustyricotta@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I switched to jellyfish last year. Though I didn’t try to get watch history over. Jellyfin should handle your file structure very similarly to Plex, so if what you have now works, it should work on jellyfin.

      If it’s only you and you’re only using phones and laptops outside, then you can just skip reverse proxy and all that and just VPN into your system. Wireguard, tailscale, or zerotier are good options with simple easy setups.

      I think you should just give jellyfin a try. You can run it at the same time as Plex, so you can just play around with it and see how you like it.

      • ZebrasRcool@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thanks rusty for the helpful answer! I’m going to have a look at downloading it and setting it up later tonight. I’ve heard a lot of good things about tailscale, so I might look for some newbie tailscale guides. When it comes to that kinda stuff, my biggest worry is that I might miss a step or not set it up right and then I’ve ended up exposing everything to the unfiltered internet and then my PC ends up in a botnet

  • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This headline is misleading. If the owner of the server has Plex pass than the users can use remote streaming as normal. If the owner does not have Plex pass, then the users need Plex pass to use that server remotely

    Imo a stupid move by Plex, but as a lifetime Plex pass holder, no one that uses mine will have to worry so I’m relatively unbothered.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Dito. Every discussion I’ve seen, people were acting like Plex is already dead. This will basically change nothing for most people

      • Kurroth@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        And free local network management is still a fair deal… Pay for extra features makes sense for this kind of service? The software needs maintenance and new hardware is always being released so new bugs. Better methods of netow and transcoding etc, this kind of software isn’t a drop and run, it still needs work after release. So I get the need to form some kind of long term sustainability, we all saw it coming.

  • Grostleton@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lol, OK Plex, cya.

    They’re honestly lucky I was willing to pay the $2.99 or whatever it was to be able to access MY server, using MY internet and cell data, to access MY media files from MY phone. Plenty fair a price for a nice app, might’ve paid a few bucks more but they can screw off trying to charge a monthly fee for… nothing in particular in my usage case.

    Literally just set up Jellyfin w/ Tailscale which took all of 10 minutes and works just as well. GG no re 🖕

  • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I deleted Plex from my barely functional home server.

    I’ll give Jellyfin a try. I just want to be able to access my music away from home

        • fl42v@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          As in, symfonium.app? If so, seems questionable, given its proprietary nature and unavailability outside the play store. Although, the feature set is interesting.

          Edit: yeeeah, no

          From their FAQ:

          licences checks requires a call to the verification server from time to time

          The license is tied to your Google account

    • im_not_here@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      In my experience Jellyfin doesn’t find or handle subtitles nearly as well, and I can’t watch modern movies without subtitles.

      • cujo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have never had an issue with subtitles on Jellyfin, and my wife has turned our household into an always-on subtitles household. Are you making use of the Open Subtitles plugin?

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m probably gonna set up Jellyfin this weekend. Any tips for a first timer?

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Take it slow.
      Don’t ditch Plex just yet but slowly transition the move.
      Test it with your usual browser. If playback doesnt work, test with another browser or the phone app.

    • 007Ace@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Set up docker. I ran an installation on Linux and on Windows for a few years but having it running from docker using external drives for library is a game changer. Always up to date. User files and settings Safed on a seperate folder so you can transfer it to a different os any time. Fantastic.

      • ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        This, also a recurring thing I keep hearing from people moving from Plex to Jellyfin is that not all media get recognised correctly.

        Which is probably because Jellyfin is less forgiving on file structure, file names. So check their site first for what Jellyfin needs: https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/server/media/shows

        It’s not unreasonable requirements just seems somehow Plex didn’t care about structure as much.

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              How so?
              I am outside of the states and have absolutely no issues with recognition. Not for TV, movie nor anime.
              And it’s usually available on tmdb or tvdb.

              • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Should have clarified. It’s not an option if you want to use it to get content that is not in english. For german content for example, you need access to german private trackers which you only get with a good torrenting record in addition to catching the exceedingly rare opportunities to get an invite.

                • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Doesnt matter.
                  I download multiple things with radarr from 3 available german trackers without issues.
                  Imports properly and depending on my jellyfin library settings will get either german or english metadata.

                  Dunno what you are having trouble with.

  • Krusty@feddit.it
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m actually using Jellyfin but I hate the fact that there’s no easy way to install a client on Samsung TVs (Tizen OS) :(

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is there an easy way on any smart tv? I’ve got a Sony, it’s been a pain for some things but I haven’t tried jellyfin or emby on it yet.

    • quid_pro_joe@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is a alpha client and instructions available here: https://smartdigihere.com/jellyfin-on-samsung-smart-tv/

      However as stated further down the article, it’s easier to just use a web browser and access your jellyfin server that way. Login, bookmark the URL (don’t forget to include the port) and then hit full screen.

      Note: You may need to tweak (server side) your transcoding and subtitle settings.

    • x2Zero7@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Soon™ it’ll be on the store. Having to build and push to tizen is the absolute worst part of jellyfin (if you have to) otherwise there’s clients for every platform - even LG’s webOS.

      There’s also finamp for music specific playback, so jellyfin can pretty much do everything

  • blink@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was planning to switch to Jellyfin but having to sideload the app in my Samsung TV is a headache for me. But guess I will be doing exactly that now.

    • storm@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you really don’t want to deal with sideloading, Jellyfin can be accessed through an add on in Kodi (assuming Kodi is easily installable on the TV)

  • Talaraine@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I thought it was pretty commonplace for people to just set up a vpn on their router and act like they’re on their own network. I guess I’m an idiot, but I’m actually surprised people were paying for this in the first place.