Powderhorn@beehaw.org to Politics@beehaw.orgEnglish · 4 months agoThe far-right’s pretend fight against antisemitism is a perfect political strategy | Rachel Shabiwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkThe far-right’s pretend fight against antisemitism is a perfect political strategy | Rachel Shabiwww.theguardian.comPowderhorn@beehaw.org to Politics@beehaw.orgEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square9fedilink
minus-squareMachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months agoI called it noise the first time too. Nothing seperate. Try to keep up.
minus-squarePowderhorn@beehaw.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoAd hominems are not allowed on Beehaw. If you want to do this sort of thing, do it elsewhere.
minus-squareMachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 months ago“Try to keep up” is no more an ad hominem than “did you read the article?”, and your comment labelling mine as an ad hominem is far more so than either. Please go ahead and ban me, if this is how your instance does things.
minus-squarePowderhorn@beehaw.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·4 months agoNo, “did you read the article?” is a valid question. “Try to keep up” is an ad hominem. False equivalence and the sort of bullshit the right pulls.
I called it noise the first time too. Nothing seperate. Try to keep up.
Ad hominems are not allowed on Beehaw. If you want to do this sort of thing, do it elsewhere.
“Try to keep up” is no more an ad hominem than “did you read the article?”, and your comment labelling mine as an ad hominem is far more so than either. Please go ahead and ban me, if this is how your instance does things.
No, “did you read the article?” is a valid question. “Try to keep up” is an ad hominem. False equivalence and the sort of bullshit the right pulls.