• originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    because life is less important than ‘honor’ or some such nonsense.

    religion is a vestigial trait that must be culled. a crutch of the weak mind humans no longer require

    • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It seems a lot of humans still require it though, that’s the whole problem imho. If everyone was on the same page it would have disappeared or be no more than folklore same for the rest of legends and such like.

      But a lot of humans still have a long way to go and waaaayyyy too many are preying on them while too little of us are steering towards betterment…

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        a lot of humans require it, or a lot of humans are raised in an environment where they have no choice?

        i suspect the number of people that require religion for psychological reasons is quite small. the rest are just indoctrinated

        • emptyother@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I dont think theres so few. A lot of people have a need to be led. And if it isnt religion and gods it is something else. Like “leaders”. Like the golden(-ish) cow the US’ republicans are worshiping.

            • emptyother@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I believe MOST people have such a strong need to follow something that they will ignore or invent justification for the morality of it. And I dont think one can learn that, rather one has to learn NOT to follow. But I’m no psychiatrist.

              • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                we are social beings, we require each others company. that some will lead and others will follow is a natural, psychological state of our species. that said, at no point is religion or spirituality required for that process.

        • hatsa122@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          A lot of people still required it for spiritual reasons. Atheism is not for everyone and some still need directions from a superior force in order to put their values/lives in order.

          I’m find that behaviour naive and kind of foolish, but as long as they are respectful with others and don’t try to convert everyone else I don’t see a problem.

          That’s said, Christians are way less indoctrinated and usually are freely to choose, at least in my experience ( western europe ). If that’s possible is thanks to the historically separation of church and state, which is something the other 2 big religions dosnt seem to like.

          • STOMPYI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            We don’t need spirituality but it will enrich a life if done with love and compassion for all regardless of gender sex identity geography or color or anything. I am the same as you reading this, had I been born in your situation with ypur life and your parents my 'best thinking would be your best thinking. Humans are an expression of circumstance privlage mostly with some individual aspects …

          • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            if you were raised in an environment where the truth of ‘spirituality’ is that its completely fake, would they still require it?

            if all of the worlds children were raised without religion or spirituality, would it still be a requirement?

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I agree on principle, and I’m an atheist myself.

      But the concept of faith, with a set of never changing rules and the ability to categorize things easily into good and bad, is far more persuasive and powerful than the vague assembly of progressive values associated with a belief in rationality. Also, a massive part of the human population is centering their life around their respective assembly of mystified guidelines and ethics, and the search for a spiritual truth is also very ingrained and inherent to the human condition.

      Simply removing that wont work without replacing the void with a new belief system and ethics code.

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        i disagree. the thirst for religion is almost entirely because we, as children, are indoctrinated before we even have the ability of choice.

        i would suspect a generation raised without religion at all would not require, or even desire religious ideals.

        i disagree that a religious framework is ever required for morality or rule-creation in absolutely any capacity. its superfluous.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      (your) life is less important than (doing what I tell you)

      It never applies in the same way to the people who are doing the telling. Only to the ones being told.