simple@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 days agoUS appeals court rejects copyrights for AI-generated art lacking 'human' creatorwww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10 cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkUS appeals court rejects copyrights for AI-generated art lacking 'human' creatorwww.reuters.comsimple@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 16 days agomessage-square8fedilink cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-squareBeej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-215 days ago Why would you give a machine money? To be clear, you’d give the company that owns the machine money. Just use the generation tools yourself and then you have the copyright. Except that it sounds like no, you wouldn’t by this court case, right? it’s just worthless AI slop. I agree. :)
To be clear, you’d give the company that owns the machine money.
Except that it sounds like no, you wouldn’t by this court case, right?
I agree. :)