A sad day for emulation and open source advocates, and a reminder that Nintendo can and will destroy you if they see fit.

Hopefully their works will live in the saved repos just as ReVanced was able to live on after YouTube shut the original project down.

  • Q*Bert Reynolds@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Each dev kit is $450. Being able to test on an emulator is free. Sure, you ultimately want to test on hardware, but indie dev teams aren’t going to shell out that kind of money for each developer. Who gives a fuck about indie developers though, right?

    • Mesophar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean, you’re right. I don’t agree with the emulators being taken down, it sucks, but it’s hardly surprising that Nintendo, a company known for strictly protecting their copyrights, would go after these projects.

      Hopefully other people and projects can pick up the reins, but should always be ready and prepared for another strike like this.

  • forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Running their mouths on Discord. Using Patreon to profit from (not) piracy (but everyone knows it is). Reckless display of hubris.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Since there’s now legal precedent, and GitHub already has the signatures of the project code, they will simply now close down any fork that matches the code signatures to avoid getting sued by Nintendo as well.

      Hopefully someone forked it to a completely different self-hosted GitHub-like instance or the other GitHub alternatives.

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It would be better to “git clone” a repo under threat of removal than fork it in Github. That way an entire copy of its history is preserved. It’s possible the forks still exist for now, even if Yuzu removes their official repo, but if Nintendo serves Github the legal paperwork then the forks will get blasted.

        That said if someone clones the repo, they probably ought to think twice before putting it back in the cloud without sanitizing / reconstructing the branches & history absent of the bits that got Yuzu into trouble in the first place.

          • I don’t? You can apply a similar technique to bust file hashes. Add a new comment to each source file, or whatever.

            My point is that automated methods to detect unwanted content will only get GitHub so far. It will have to be fuzzy, and that means it’s an arms race between detectors and obfuscators.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The repository removal was voluntary and done by the Yuzu team. GitHub doesn’t have to do anything and won’t do anything. Even when they receive a DMCA takedown, they only block forks made through GitHub’s “fork” button.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Voluntary from the perspective of GitHub. If it was through a DMCA request, all the forks would be gone with it.

      • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        There isn’t a legal precedent. Unless I misunderstood, this is a settlement and settlements aren’t! Legal precedent. Which is why big e.g. pharma likes them, because then they don’t have the legal precedent for the next case.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Court cases shouldn’t be allowed to be settled out of court after a certain point.

          • cm0002@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Wym? Nintendo formerly filed the lawsuit just a few days ago and then Yuzu rolled right over…

            I mean I get it, but if they had 2Mil to settle, they could have fought Nintendo, I know that 2 million wouldn’t have seen them to the end, but im sure an organization like EFF could have assisted from there

      • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Oh there will be forks across the git-verse. There’s no way there wouldn’t be.

        Also does this create precedent? - they settled, its not like it actually went to court.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yup, the work of Yuzu isnt lost at all. It’s just going to take time to see how that work will be advanced – will Ryujinx absorb the developers and their knowledge or will Yuzu continue?

  • spacebanana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    More people would purchase the games if they weren’t 60€ MSRP each regardless of size and quality.

    I used to emulate switch games to test them as a free trial first, then I would buy them in second hand for half the price (which is still a lot, 30€ for a nintendo game versus 14€ for Nichijou volume)

    • Aylex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      And regardless of age! Their games never go on sale. And they don’t use local pricing (the actual term escapes me rn), so us poors in the 3rd world are stuck paying half a months salary for 7 year old games 🤪

  • Gabu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    My already-installed copy of these softwares won’t go anywhere, Nintendo. Get bent.

      • Uvine_Umbra@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yuzu claims to have earned 30k from patreon, where they give their most recent builds with the most bug-fixes & optimizations.

        The switch has been out for 7 years. Most they could’ve earned then would be 210k, and even doubling it wouldn’t get close to 2 million

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          They’ve been earning 30k USD per month according to their patreon page. I’ve read in a comment that they’ve doubled their supporters at the time TOTK was leaked.

          Interestingly 30k USD per month over 7 years is 2.5m USD, which is pretty close to the 2.3m USD settlement.

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Tbh I think they were smart to incorporate. It might have drawn a larger target on their backs (though patreon’s target probably dwarfed it), but it also meant that individually they were financially protected from Nintendo. They’ll probably still have to pay Nintendo whatever their corporation currently has even if they declare bankruptcy, but at least the devs aren’t having their wages garnished until the end of time.

        If they do attempt to declare bankruptcy, let’s hope Nintendo doesn’t try and sue them again to pierce the corporate veil.

        • pixelscript@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          This is almost word for word what I said in another friend group today. Protecting individuals is literally why LLCs exist. It’s what “LLC” stands for.

          Nintendo Hyper Beam’d them into oblivion but they got a Substitute up first. The defense strategy was smart. The strategy that put them in the position of needing to use the defense strategy was idiotic, yes, but the defense was smart.

          Short of Nintendo doing nothing at all, this is probably the best outcome that could have realistically happened.

        • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Although it works out for these developers I hate that people can do this to avoid the full consequences of their actions.

          • MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I hate this too. But - what if we start using this ability to our advantage, just like these guys did? Corps use it, let’s also abuse it so they can’t destroy us without also waiving their rights. LLCs are the privacy abstraction layer of the real world. I figured that even registering your own personal domain is much safer when done through your own LLC than on your personal name. The examples are many.