A survey of more than 2,000 smartphone users by second-hand smartphone marketplace SellCell found that 73% of iPhone users and a whopping 87% of Samsung Galaxy users felt that AI adds little to no value to their smartphone experience.

SellCell only surveyed users with an AI-enabled phone – thats an iPhone 15 Pro or newer or a Galaxy S22 or newer. The survey doesn’t give an exact sample size, but more than 1,000 iPhone users and more than 1,000 Galaxy users were involved.

Further findings show that most users of either platform would not pay for an AI subscription: 86.5% of iPhone users and 94.5% of Galaxy users would refuse to pay for continued access to AI features.

From the data listed so far, it seems that people just aren’t using AI. In the case of both iPhone and Galaxy users about two-fifths of those surveyed have tried AI features – 41.6% for iPhone and 46.9% for Galaxy.

So, that’s a majority of users not even bothering with AI in the first place and a general disinterest in AI features from the user base overall, despite both Apple and Samsung making such a big deal out of AI.

  • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Am I crazy? I’ve got this thing writing code and listing website listings. I ask it certain things before Google and just have it give me the source. I use it to sum up huge documents to quickly analyze them before I go through them. Feels like how Google felt I when it first came out. Yall using the same ai?

    (Apple ai is not what I’m talking about)

    • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve asked bing gpt to find me 4k laptops and it proceeded to list 5 laptops that weren’t 4k. Asked for the heaviest Pokemon and it responded wailord which has never been correct. Had gpt (not bing) attempt to write an AHK script for me to have forwards and backwards media keys, it failed. I asked it to fix it, it said what was broken, why it didn’t work and then fixed it by giving me the exact code that didnt work the first time.

      It’s consistently wrong to me so i now just skip it because if I haven’t to double check everything it says anyway, I might as well just do the research myself.

    • ScannerPlanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I also use gen AI for coding assistance and have had an extremely positive experience, but I almost never use it on my smartphone

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Not only that, but Google assistant is getting consistently less reliable. Like half the time now I ask it a question and it just does an image search or something or completely misunderstands me in some other manner. They deserted working, decent tech for unreliable, unwanted tech because ???

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Profit potential. Think of AI as one big data collector to sell you shit. It is significantly better at learning things about you than any metadata or cookies ever could.

      If you think of this AI push as “trying to make a better product” it will not make much sense. If you think of the AI push as “how do I collect more data on all my users and better directly influence their choices” it makes a lot more sense.

      • bravesirrbn ☑️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t think the LLM spouting nonsense responses part actively contributes to collecting and learning about user data much. Regular search queries and other behaviors (click tracking etc) already do this well enough and have most likely been using loads of machine learning for many years now

        • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Star Trek was space communism. So we’d have to kill the capitalist first.

          We’re heading more towards Star Wars and the Empire. See you in the resistance.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Tbf most people have no clue how to use it.

    I just tought my mom how to use circle to search and it’s a real game changer for her. She can quickly lookup onscreen items (like plants shes reading about) from an image and the on screen translation is incredible.

    Also circle to search gets around link and text copy blocking giving you back the same freedoms you had on a PC.

    • Hoimo@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Google Lens already did that though, all you need is decent OCR and an image classification model (which is a precursor to the current “AI” hype, but actually useful).

        • Hoimo@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Image classification model isn’t really “AI” the way it’s marketed right now. If Google used an image classification model to give you holiday recommendations or answer general questions, everyone would immediately recognize they use it wrong. But use a token prediction model for purposes totally unrelated to predicting the next token and people are like “ChatGPT is my friend who tells me what to put on pizza and there’s nothing strange about that”.

            • Hoimo@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Neither LLMs nor ICMs are AI in any sense of the word, is my point. LLMs happen to give the illusion of intelligence because of their language-based nature, but they’re not fundamentally different from ICMs.

  • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I only really use AI shit on my work computer (because hooray I have a Copilot license), and its only marginally better than doing searches myself. Its nice when it works because it lets me save time researching things, but I CONSTANTLY have to ask “are you sure that’s real?” because it just fucking makes up random command flags based on the prompt.

    And its only marginally better because fucking search engines have their head so far up their ass they can see their tonsils. Godsdammit I want working search engines back.

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah? Well I fucking love it on my iPhone. It’s summaries have been amazing, almost prescient. No, Siri hasn’t turned my phone into a Holodeck yet but I’m okay with that.

  • Redbranch1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I planned to skip this generation, assuming this would be the year of useless ai cramming, even though my phone was getting old. Samsung was so desperate to sell s25s upgrading was essentially less than staying with my current model. Bought it, and turned all that mess off

  • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    AI is not there to be useful for you. It is there to be useful for them. It is a perfect tool for capturing every last little thought you could have and direct to you perfectly on what they can sell you.

    It’s basically one big way to sell you shit. I promise we will follow the same path as most tech. It’ll be useful for some stuff and in this case it’s being heavily forced upon us whether we like it or not. Then it’s usefulness will be slowly diminished as it’s used more heavily to capitalize on your data, thoughts, writings, code, and learn how to suck every last dollar from you whether you’re at work or at home.

    It’s why DeepSeek spent so little and works better. They literally were just focusing on the tech.

    All these billions are not just being spent on hardware or better optimized software. They are being spent on finding the best ways to profit from these AI systems. It’s why they’re being pushed into everything.

    You won’t have a choice on whether you want to use it or not. It’ll soon by the only way to interact with most systems even if it doesn’t make sense.

    Mark my words. When Google stops standard search on their home page and it’s a fucking AI chat bot by default. We are not far off from that.

    It’s not meant to be useful for you.

    • anonvurr@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      DeepSeek cost so little because they were able to use the billions that OpenAI and others spent and fed that into their training. DeepSeek would not exist (or would be a lot more primitive) if it weren’t for OpenAI.

    • astro_plane@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, it seems like no one even read the damn user agreement. AI just adds another level to our surveillance state. Its only there to collect information about you and to figure out the inner workings of its users minds to sell ads. Gemini even listens to your conversations if you have the quick access toggle enabled.

  • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    My kids school just did a survey and part of it included questions about teaching technology with a big focus on the use of AI. My response was “No” full stop. They need to learn how to do traditional research first so that they can spot check the error ridden results generated by AI. Damn it school, get off the bandwagon.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I say this as an education major, and former teacher. That being said, please keep fighting your PTA on this.

      We didn’t get actually useful information in high school, partially because our parents didn’t think there was anything wrong with the curriculum.

      I’m absolutely certain that there are multiple subjects that you may have skipped out on, if you’d had any idea that civics, shop, home economics, and maybe accounting were going to be the closest classes to “real world skills that all non collegate educated people still need to know.”

      • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I regret not taking shop and home economics. Filing taxes and balancing checkbooks would be good skills to learn also.

    • Akito@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And what exactly is the difference between researching shit sources on plain internet and getting the same shit via an AI, except manually it takes 6 hours and with AI it takes 2 minutes?

      • clonedhuman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I think the fact someone would need to explain this to you makes it pointless to try and explain it to you. I can’t tell whether you’re honestly asking a question or just searching for a debate to attempt to justify your viewpoint.

        • Akito@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’re implicating, there are trusted sources, I am saying, there are no trusted sources whatsoever, and you should equally doubt any source. So, who’s the one not understanding some principle?

    • silasmariner@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not sure students are necessarily benefiting? The point of education isn’t to hand in completed assignments. Although my wife swears that the Duolingo AI is genuinely helping her with learning French so I guess maybe, depending on how it’s being used

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    please burst that bubble already so i can get a second hand server grade gpu