GitHub is under automated attack by millions of cloned repositories filled with malicious code.::Thanks to a combination of sophisticated methodology and social engineering, this particular attack seems to be very difficult to stop.

  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    A decentralized developer community is resilient against this sort of attack for the very reason GitHub is so vulnerable: size.

    No, it’s not. Not in literally any way. Not 1%. Now 0.000000000000000001%. You don’t even get security by obscurity as a nebulous benefit because the core mechanisms are basically the same between instances.

    No projects are being compromised. They’re being imitated and passed off as the real thing to the naive. You can just as easily do that on another server (including established ones by adding multiple domains to your scripts) when people expect to use thousands of different git hosts as you can on GitHub, except without the benefit of the scale of Microsoft’s expertise at handling this type of attack.

    I’m all for federated git being the way forward. I’d love to see it grow into a reasonable option. But it has no benefit in any context from an attack like this.

    • hatedbad@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      a decentralized community that correctly prioritizes security would absolutely be using signed commits and other web-of-trust security practices to prevent this sort of problem

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        New accounts exist and have good reason to exist. You can’t and shouldn’t ban new accounts from creating projects.

        Anyone capable of understanding what “web of trust” means is already way too sophisticated to be misled by these fake projects.