• cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Looks like anything that would be an improvement for people and humanity in general is severely frowned upon in some places.

    • EstonianGuy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I swear the US Republicans are against anything good, literally they are biblical levels of evil.

  • elenorfighter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    For what reason? The last time a checked lab meat cost 3 thousand dollars per Kilo. Because it is still experimental. It is not like you can buy it in the supermarket.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    We all know that Mississippi is one of the most rational states, so I’m sure they aren’t letting their stupid religious beliefs drive their science. /s

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    republicans chasing ghosts, episode 2137

    outside of silicon valley marketing materials, lab-grown meat is ridiculously expensive or straight up doesn’t exist. deer has immune systems, grasshopper has immune system, stainless steel reactor full of cell suspension doesn’t. in order to prevent entire batch turning into mold or something, every starting material has to be pharma-grade and every operation has to be performed in sterile technique. it’s all fine for products like insulin or vaccines where single dose fits easily in sub-mg range, but if you try to price meat like this, it won’t be ever competitive for this reason alone.

    but it gets worse, because people who try do that are some random techbros without engineering background. strangely enough, this doesn’t matter, because every enterprise of this kind just rides on VC money. predictably, they burn it all. as long as you can attract it, things are good and for that all you need is good pitch. We’ll solve single cell meat with nanotechnology! We’ll solve single cell meat with 3d-printing! We’ll solve single cell meat with blockchain! We’ll solve single-cell meat with chatbots!

    if you believe these people, world is simple and future is bright. i know many of you all on lemmy do.

    i’ll say more: these people are selling imagined future where you can save the world in some measure (go vegan), and you don’t have to give up anything in the process (eating meat), as long as you Buy Our Product! then there are credulous marks primed for luxurious gay space consumerism, but magic tech that allows for it is just beyond the corner, then they disappear. but people still believe, and are disappointed when they have to make even tiny sacrifice on their own. newsflash dipshit: future won’t be convenient

    • forrcaho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s an overly negative take. Yes, there are serious challenges to the production of lab-grown meat; Wikipedia provides a good summary. This isn’t a business that’s ready to take off soon. But humans who are actually smart and do know what they’re doing are working to solve these things.

      The challenges are serious, and anyone telling you “world is simple and future is bright” about the future of this industry, yeah, that’s bullshit. I’ve never heard anyone say that, and I don’t know where you heard that from. It might never be a viable industry. But it’s not just a gimmick to keep fleecing VC investors.

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        it’s not a business, it’s a set of startup pitches for people who believe in californian ideology. you’ll make a great vc, never let reality and limitations of physics and biology get in way of your plans

    • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      what I find silly about going “vegan” is that it’s roughly 5% of the US population. Let’s say you boost it to 10% with all the posturing about saving the planet. Getting 50% of the population to half their meat consumption would have 5x the impact.

  • Syun@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    How unnecessary. Lab grown meat will fail to sell and be dropped from stores all on its own merits.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Any data to support that? I’ve noticed that the animal free meat options at the grocery stores near me are growing.

      • Syun@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Are you talking about Animal free “meat”, like impossible burgers, or are you talking about actual lab grown meat? I’m not aware of lab grown meat being on the shelves yet, and animal free meat options isn’t the same thing as lab grown meat.

        From what I’ve read in a few places, and this really does make sense, it’s one thing to grow a vat of animal derived proteins, but all you have at that point is basically goo. That has to be processed into “muscles”, which is a process of creating long chains of these proteins and bundling them. Then there’s the question of fat: what is that process? You can’t just add some oil and think it’s going to actually be analogous to fatty layers, and lipid cells have to be arranged into, I dunno, rinds? Blobs for “ground beef”, I guess, but you see what I mean.

        I think this is as neat an idea as anyone does. And I can ask you the same question: any data to support the idea that I’m wrong? Everything I’ve read about this that goes into any amount of detail talks about the difficulties of actually processing this into something that resembles meat as we know it. I have seen absolutely nothing, and I’ve looked, to suggest that there’s been any kind of meaningful success in making these protein slurries into anything we’d call meat. I’d imagine that ground meats would be the obvious first thing to come to market, that’s gonna be the easiest thing to do. But a steak? Boy, color me skeptical. The other thing that I would imagine would be a difficult thing to replicate is going to be flavor. The animals we eat get their flavors in large part from how they’re fed and raised. Chickens in the US haven’t got the flavor of chickens in Europe, for example. Or a domesticated turkey vs a wild one. There are high grade steaks that you can get and when you see the fat caps, you can see a difference in color due to the cow’s diet. How do they control for that? How do they create these proteins and make them flavorful? Will simple nutrient baths do that? Is there more to it than that? What will the B vitamin content be, and where will that come from? Will it be more bioavailable to the eater? Will it be premethylated, or will people with methylation problems in their livers not be able to effectively get those B vitamins from these meats? How will all of that effect cost?

        Everything I understand about this is that while they can grow the proteins, the food engineering that it takes to make a piece of meat that will be able to compete with meat from the hoof is a way off, and that we’re a long way from this being cheap.

        I’d bet that the first lab meats we see coming to market are going to be gooey and bland. I’m imagining ground turkey but worse. And I’d be happy to be wrong, but I don’t expect that making meats that are actually analogous to “real” meat is going to be a process of fast iteration. I was around for the beginning of the meat substitutes that came along in the 80s and they were DIRE. And there’s nothing to suggest that the processes they’ve discovered for texturing plant based mock meats can be applied to this lab grown meat goo. Everything I’ve read, and it all makes logical sense to me, suggests that this is going to take a long time to become actually appealing to the masses just because of the pretty substantial food engineering problems that it presents.

        My guess is that it’s going to end up being its own thing, more like the “mock duck” and things you can get in cans. Bite sized pieces. I’ll be happily surprised if they can grow a steak in a lab within my lifetime.

    • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Cheap guilt free meat built to whatever fat percentage you want will fail to sell?

      Well you enjoy your $50/lbs wagu, and I’ll enjoy exactly the same quality at $3/lbs.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean there’s a difference between normal steak and wagu too.

        Like at my Walmart steak is selling for ~$10/lbs, and ground beef is like $6 or $7 per pound. Right now beyond ground beef is selling for ~$11/lbs.

        And it doesn’t taste the same. So you will actually have to hit that $3/lbs mark your talking about before it becomes a good option. Because pork chops are already only $4/lbs

        • yunxiaoli@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          But it inevitably will become that cheap, as your steak and pork become infinitely, exponentially more expensive over time.

          We’re already massively subsidizing meat production and we’re entirely ignoring the majority of meats costs in calculating prices.

          Those costs are going to keep getting higher, however, and those subsidies won’t be able to last even in a wealthy monetary issues country like the US. Unless you completely abandon capitalism, real beef isnt going to be a thing for middle class or poor people within 20 years, and it won’t be a thing period within a hundred.

          However the tech to print meat will get smaller and cheaper over time and the seed ingredients are already cheaper than the land maintenance and feed for real livestock. Hell it’s cheaper than most inputs for anything except corn and wheat. There will be a time in the next few decades where middle class people in smart countries will have a meat printer at home to make whatever they want for dinner and shopping for meat will be too prohibitively expensive for anyone but the rich.

          Climate change is already causing crop failures and water distribution fights, and quite frankly the meat industry doesn’t have enough money to fight the climate on this issue.

            • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m not so sure; I seem to remember lots of things that were dismissed as not worthy of thinking about, won’t have any effect on culture, etc.

              I’m not saying the claims of “techbros” are to be taken without evidence, I’m saying going maximalist “it will never happen” is quite a take. I’ve heard that about self-driving cars and AI. These things are also not all the way there yet (certainly not AGI), but to dismiss them out of hand? I would never bet on that, and the fact is both are already seeing their impacts.

            • FatCrab@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              First, that article literally says the process engineering analysis that paints a very dire picture of the scalability of cultured meat is difficult to find, so maybe cool it on “you should have known better.” However, it also is clear that there are A LOT of technical hurdles to overcome for lab meat, but it’s no more dead end than fusion research. It’s an important, arguably vital, area of study and research that needs to be seriously invested in so that we can one day introduce it to the toolkit of sustainable support for human society and life. While your sources have convinced me that lab meat is currently nowhere near scalable and likely will take significant developments in the culture process and even meat cells, I think your aggressive and extremely skeptical take on its value at all is more than a bit silly.

              • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                23 hours ago

                fusion at least doesn’t require breaking laws of thermodynamics to work and has stable funding from militaries of nations that field nuclear weapons. funding for synthetic meat depends on what bad scifi current oligarchs were fans of 30 years ago