Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 7 months agoSince the Turing Test seems NOT to be an accurate way to check for true AI, what is? What's will be the indicator that tells us it's arrived? I can't imagine; everything seems falsifiable.message-squaremessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1message-squareSince the Turing Test seems NOT to be an accurate way to check for true AI, what is? What's will be the indicator that tells us it's arrived? I can't imagine; everything seems falsifiable.Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 7 months agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months ago“Because quantum” always feels like new-age woo-woo bullshit. It’s more likely just too vague to define.
minus-squareteawrecks@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoIt’s good to be skeptical of people who throw the word quantum around, but in this case you’d be wrong. Penrose is the real deal.
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoNo, it’s literally a physical observable quantum collapse… Like, I know techbros just randomly yell quantum… But that doesn’t mean it’s not real, it was vague because trying to explain would be a lot of effort and most people wouldn’t understand https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-consciousness/ Knock yourself out
“Because quantum” always feels like new-age woo-woo bullshit.
It’s more likely just too vague to define.
It’s good to be skeptical of people who throw the word quantum around, but in this case you’d be wrong. Penrose is the real deal.
No, it’s literally a physical observable quantum collapse…
Like, I know techbros just randomly yell quantum…
But that doesn’t mean it’s not real, it was vague because trying to explain would be a lot of effort and most people wouldn’t understand
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-consciousness/
Knock yourself out