• Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Why? Are you afraid they’re going to treat you as poorly as you treated them? They won’t, but they absolutely should.

  • IceWallowCum [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Me sowing (parasitizing third world countries for extracting capital): hahaha yes!

    Me reaping (decomposing my productive state into a bloated financial institution): owiee nooo

  • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    “We don’t want to live in a world where the USians are the dominant country,” reply billions.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m American and would LOVE to see this piece of shit country taken down a peg or 40.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    If that is the case, you probably should have thought about that 50 years ago when “you” allowed and encouraged industries to out-source. But it’s too late now.

    • RedQuestionAsker2 [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      China: we’re going to become a manufacturing machine for the world, but we’re going to use your investment, technology, and infrastructure to build up our country and eventually overtake you.

      US capitalists: hah, yeah, sure. Would you look at these profit margins!?

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      well, the US could do a revolution, nationalize what’s left of the country and then start rebuilding. that would prevent this ghastly future…

      but nah, they’re gonna ride neoliberalism to the grave.

  • MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    “the Chinese”

    Not China (the country), not the PRC (the country), but “the Chinese.”

    Because that’s what the US ambassador thinks of Chinese people.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      But assuming that one has to be dominant, which would you choose of the ones that are realistic possibilities?

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Unfortunately I don’t think it will work. If “BRICS” was somehow in charge, China would just take over.

          • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Everyone is not like UK or USA.

            So you are okay with living under extreme censorship? Not being able to talk about Tienamin Square, etc? Okay with being complicit in atrocities like Tibet, and inevitably Taiwan if unopposed?

            Oh nevermind, if this is your politics. No room for exchange is left I think. Giving benefit of doubt almost always backfires.

            • realitista@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Interesting for you to fold under even the first question to explain your position, but so be it.

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          So you are okay with living under extreme censorship? Not being able to talk about Tienamin Square, etc? Okay with being complicit in atrocities like Tibet, and inevitably Taiwan if unopposed?

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Who is that? Certainly none of the countries that could actually take up the mantle. And I fear that any country that could would finally become imperialist. If we say that the top 3 competitors are US, China, and Russia, there’s only one that hasn’t actively attempted conquest and annexation of their neighbors.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            All 3 have, what are you smoking? The US is one of the most imperialistic nations on Earth. That’s not to say Russia and China aren’t either, but to pretend the US didn’t forcibly annex territories is to wash away the centuries of genocide and Conquest as “okay” because it was done successfully and more than a few years ago.

            • realitista@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Do you consider things which happened hundreds of years ago to be of the same weight as things that are happening as we speak?

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                Do you consider things which happened merely decades ago, even up to hundreds of years ago, have lasting impact on generations that follow?

                If you successfully do Imperialism, such that the colonized can no longer resist, does that erase the sin?

                • realitista@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t, but if given a choice between living under a power that’s actively attacking and subjugating its neighbors and committing genocides and one that’s not, I’ll take the one that’s not.

      • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well, we can work towards changing that, and judging by this article we’re well on the way it seems.