• Nugget@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Agreed, but even with fewer cars, having the remaining ones be electric is much better. Quieter (at low speeds) and no fumes

    • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      So there’s no point in improving technology then? Shall we just go for highly polluting SUVs, just fewer of them?

      • Nakedmole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        That sounds like a strawman argument tbh. I didn’t say anything along those lines. I in fact agree that electric cars are better, just like smaller cars are better too but the basic problem, that they are cars, always remains. What improves cities the most is reducing the number of cars and rededicating streets and parking lots to sidewalks, bike paths, gardens and public parks.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Before cars were common, despite bicycles, trams, and trains all existing for a long time, our cities were filled with horses. Horses have this habit of shitting everywhere, and cars were welcomed because they made the cities cleaner and less disease ridden.

      The horses filled a need that other things could not. Cars then filled that need. That needs still exists today, like it or not. It’s best we make them as clean as we can.