While I agree with you, I think that the basic reason that things don’t go that way is that advocates of dramatically stronger restrictions on firearms know that they don’t have the three-quarters of states necessary to do a new amendment, so the only way for them to get restrictions is to try to push through laws and hope that they don’t get ruled by SCOTUS to be a violation of the Second Amendment.
Not endorsing it, just saying that there’s a reason that you don’t have serious efforts to repeal the Second Amendment or the like.
With a Constitutional amendment, like you’re supposed to.
Licenses, tax stamps, storage requirements & any other scheme you come up with is & will be ruled Unconstitutional until you can amend the 2nd.
I swear, some of you have never even walked past a US civics class.
While I agree with you, I think that the basic reason that things don’t go that way is that advocates of dramatically stronger restrictions on firearms know that they don’t have the three-quarters of states necessary to do a new amendment, so the only way for them to get restrictions is to try to push through laws and hope that they don’t get ruled by SCOTUS to be a violation of the Second Amendment.
Not endorsing it, just saying that there’s a reason that you don’t have serious efforts to repeal the Second Amendment or the like.