• aluminium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bruh, I actually prefer the “Web 2.0” solution. That way the god damn editor can’t just start accessing all the shit on my drive.

    • TheOldRazzleDazzle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol but included in the source for www.texteditor.com is analytics, beacons, etc from Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, Cloudfare, and a bajillion different ad networks that send the content of your text file to AI models.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Web 2.0 or: “Instead of loading all code from the same URL the website now needs a dozen of different scripts from a dozen of different URLs, gives a shit about CSP and only shows a blank page when JS and/or cookies are disabled.”

  • mawkler@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not sure which is worse. I mean most desktop programs are just glorified web browsers anyway (i.e Electron)

    • grue@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What do you mean, “most?” Electron apps are the vast minority of desktop apps.