• daddy32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not censorship, it’s “censorship”. You know, like banning nazis, calls for harming women etc.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Generally speaking, when a much stronger party forces upon you a mechanism, it doesn’t work in your favor. Whether they call it free speech (for bot campaigns too, while you get banned) or moderation (your opponent insults you in every comment, and they are fine, but you insult them once - you’re banned).

        The super weirdest thing is that people again and again believe that the strong party belonging to “their” side will do things right this time in history.

    • techforwhat@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It should be interesting to see how it plays out, indeed.

      I don’t expect the US will entirely ban all forms of content moderation. I wouldn’t be surprised if the US moved more in the direction of the EU Digital Services Act: required transparency on recommendation algorithms and some sort of NGO trusted flagger system.

      Also, similar (but opposite) to Splinternet: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brussels_effect