• Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    FWIW, I think the term “echo-chamber” is way overused, almost to the point of being meaningless. I also don’t believe in the sincerity and coherence of American-style conceptions of “free speech”.

    “Fediverse shouldn’t allow convervatives communities” is nuts though. This is not workable from a practical perspective (forget the moral questions for a second).

    Racism, overt dehumanisation, denial of widely accepted mass scale human rights abuses; that’s something that can be managed from a moderation standpoint. But this would impact groups across the political spectrum (nazies, tankies, some far right, some far left).

    • davesmith@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The paradox of intolerance: tolerating intolerance immediately results in an intolerant society.

      There are various paradoxes and limitations inherent to a socially liberal society (not including the obvious issues of capitalism) that have been exploited by billionaires, fascists, strongmen, religious nuts and many others.

    • Donald J. Musk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      FWIW, I think the term “echo-chamber” is way overused

      Fair point! I agree with all your points made.

      I should clarify and say that I think Lemmy very much wants to erase all conservative content from the fediverse. Which is totally against what the fediverse stands for.