The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agoComing down...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageComing down...lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squarestebo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoif it’s a portmanteau of work and alcoholic, shouldn’t it be “workoholic”?
minus-squareletsgo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 months agoMore to the point if “addicted to alcohol” is alcoholic, why isn’t “addicted to work” workic?
minus-squarestebo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoyes but then it’s not really a portmanteau anymore
minus-squareDasus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoBecause language isn’t completely arbitrary, but it is weird. Mitchell & Webb - Watergategate
minus-squareKlear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 months agoLanguage can be weird sometimes, but… it’s not exactly brain surgery, is it?
if it’s a portmanteau of work and alcoholic, shouldn’t it be “workoholic”?
More to the point if “addicted to alcohol” is alcoholic, why isn’t “addicted to work” workic?
yes but then it’s not really a portmanteau anymore
Because language isn’t completely arbitrary, but it is weird.
Mitchell & Webb - Watergategate
Language can be weird sometimes, but… it’s not exactly brain surgery, is it?