return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前TikTok returns to Apple, Google app storeswww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkTikTok returns to Apple, Google app storeswww.cnbc.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前message-square10fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 个月前You make a good point. Trump will be out in 4 years and the new gov could possibly charge them then.
minus-squareDeceptichum@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 个月前Gee sounds like it’s in TikToks best interest to support Trump next “election”.
minus-square🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 个月前That raises the question of if u can pardon someone for something they have yet to be charged with?
minus-squareTeamAssimilation@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 个月前USA has done “preemptive strikes” and “enhanced interrogation “, I’m sure they will find a workaround.
minus-squareMrTrono@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·5 个月前I think they would still be open to civil liability, for services that compete with TikTok or anybody who could claim harm came from companies refusal to follow the law.
You make a good point. Trump will be out in 4 years and the new gov could possibly charge them then.
Gee sounds like it’s in TikToks best interest to support Trump next “election”.
That raises the question of if u can pardon someone for something they have yet to be charged with?
USA has done “preemptive strikes” and “enhanced interrogation “, I’m sure they will find a workaround.
I think they would still be open to civil liability, for services that compete with TikTok or anybody who could claim harm came from companies refusal to follow the law.