• maketotaldestr0i@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    you have to take into account the article is mostly about extremely deficient areas with insufficient application, not the industrial super powers like china and usa that can afford to dump for maximum economic yield.

    • LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I do, and read the source paper linked by another commenter as well. The paper itself refers to ‘plant available K’, which is exchangeable K. That’s the potassium dissolved in the water in the soil at the time of the sample being taken, and is not indicative of the total amount of potassium held in the soil. Chasing results from a bad test is a surefire way to get bad results, like starting life saving measures because someone only took a pulse for the split second in between someone’s heartbeats.

      • maketotaldestr0i@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The soils in the deficient regions are not just deficient in bioavailable but also in the forms that would need to be liberated for plant use throughout the growing season. just look at the chemistry of a Brazillian or sub-Saharan Oxisol.