• Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I’m not sure if it qualifies, but I think so, the article is meant to expose that the rules of X do not prevent pro Nazi content.
      And I suppose the point is for the readers to reach the obvious conclusion and answer the question themselves, that it’s because X is run by a Nazi.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Deleted twitter at least 10 years ago. I assume it’s become a lot worse but is the vast majority of it really pro Nazi?

          • otto@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            That’s what I hear. I deleted my Twitter many years ago, too. Although, it was still pretty bad then

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Well for one denial of holocaust is illegal in many countries. Often under wider rules that falsification of historical facts is illegal.

          EU should ban Xitter, because it’s a channel for history falsification and hate speech.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              If you are in USA, I seriously wish so too, because the latrine that is the debate in USA is flowing over to the rest of the world.

            • tabular@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              A law to prevent spreading false history may sound good but I fear it’s not a good solution. In bad hands the law can instead can attack history to promote a false one. If an inconvenient truth happens to looks like the dribble that comes out of a Holocaust denier when took at face value then good hands may punish an otherwise good person, thus promoting a different pseudo history.

              I’m convinced I cannot trust anyone to judge - for me - what I should be able to read/hear. There must be better ways to defeat Nazism ideology.