• misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah. When they had to fight for their user base. Even Tinder was reasonably usable couple of years ago. It paired me with my current partner which must be considered a marvel of technology.

      • Trex202@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yes, but by pairing you, it lost 2 users! That’s counterintuitive to capitalism.

        So if the AI works for the users, it will bring down the app.

        If the AI works for the investors, people will get bad pairings and it will bring down the app.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Hey, it’s not “bad pairings”, it’s just a very good pairing (with fake AI profile) that “unfortunately” could never have a conversation outside the app

    • DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I went on something like 50 dates with people that I found on online dating sites. This was between 2005 and 2007 (when I met my wife via Yahoo Personals.)

          • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            And that’s the point. When it works, they lose 2 customers forever.

            It’s a filtering process that removes all the diamonds in the rough. All that’s left is the rough.

            • Obi@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              I mean that’s definitely true and all, but wouldn’t they also get a continuous fresh supply of single people (coming of age, breakups). Don’t get me wrong I totally get they want that and to keep the users hooked as well, because they’re greedy piggys, but still I don’t know if the business model is doomed if they don’t.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah the OG OKCupid was incredible. Then it was bought out and became another swiping app.

        • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Yes, they had a system where you answered questions about a wide range of topics, and answered what the ideal mate should say, then give a weight to how important that is for you. For example, you prefer chocolate over vanilla, and you want your mate to be the same, but it’s not an important factor. On the other hand, you prefer not to be a nazi, and it’s super important your mate isn’t one either. Also, there were IQ questions which allowed filtering out the stupid ones (like is the sun or the earth larger). Then the system would recommend profiles based on a match score computed from your answers. Really great. Got two relationships out of it, one is going 10 years today.

          • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Adding onto this, it was totally free and you could just endlessly scroll through profiles, read them, look at their answers to questions, etc. No need to say “yes” or “no” to each profile judt to see the next one. And if you answered all of the personality questions (there were hundreds if not thousands) you were invited to become a site mod, which I did.