Summary

The White House is drafting an executive order to dismantle the Department of Education, aligning with Trump’s long-standing pledge.

However, Congress must approve the agency’s abolition, making its passage unlikely despite GOP control. Critics, including the National Education Association, warn this move would harm students, increase costs, and weaken protections.

GOP lawmakers have repeatedly attempted to eliminate the department since its 1979 founding.

Trump also recently signed an order expanding school choice, reinforcing the Republican agenda of decentralizing education policy.

  • modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Give the power back to the states but create a credentialing system to weed out ‘unpatriotic’ teachers. Shall that be left to the states too?

  • Oniononon@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    This is a good choice as they just sit around and do nothing all day anyway considering who got elected.

    • kylie_kraft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      DoE gets in the way of funneling the money to the churches corporations.

      Let’s not kid ourselves, the churches will get some money for taking the poor kids, but the goal is to privatize education so that corporations can profit from schooling even more than they already have.

      • DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m just warning you that education is seen as an “investment”, they are already on the capitalist pigs pathway and well with so many fat pigs I think dirty pork would be best to feed the population.

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    the federal department does some very important assistance to state departments and students, but it is worth noting that states do basically all of the actual control and management of schools

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    In case anyone is still wondering if Republicans are enemies of the United States of America, you need not wonder anymore.

    • Jericho_Kane@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why use big words when small words do trick.

      Soon enough, when you have to select a language on a devive, the difference between: english (uk) and english (american) will make a whole lot more sense.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It would have been possible, for example, to say Big Brother is ungood. But this statement, which to an orthodox ear merely conveyed a self-evident absurdity, could not have been sustained by reasoned argument, because the necessary words were not available.

  • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Congress is required for all sorts of shit that Elon is doing but that isn’t stopping Elon.

    Laws are not some sort of natural force. They are implemented by people and all of those people are either fascists or cowards.

    Trumps immunity plus his pardon power make him king. All of his minions can do all the illegal things they want. Trump can then pardon them and he isn’t liable for their crimes if he is doing something roughly in line with his duties are President. John Roberts fucked us all.

    The only way this is going to be solved is by people power. Organize. Fight these fascists.

    • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Correct. If you want to see how fascism ends, look at pictures of Mussolini’s corpse hanging in public. That’s the only way it ends. The sooner the better

    • Vinstaal0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Normally the state would have a lot less power over judges. In the US the state has power over judges AND there is a jury system.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They already blocked organization by controlling the mass media and major social platforms are in cahoots.

      Facebook, Twitter/X and tiktok all pushed trump and hid Kamala during the campaign. Not to mention the influencers that got paid to push Trump.

      Any type of hashtag or trend that tries to fight back is just going to get pushed down in “the algorithm” or straight up blocked (search kamala on twitter)

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        nobody is forced to use these platforms and we were able to deal with worse restrictions.

      • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s why word-of-mouth about the Fediverse is so powerful - and why it’ll become increasingly important to return to the old methods of organizing - in person, posters put up at night, meetings in basements and in homes, discussions in back alleys and storage closets. Zines and fliers.

        • Landless2029@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think WhatsApp groups might work to spread the word as well. It’s mainstream enough and can’t be banned like other platforms.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Huh… I’m tired of feeling helpless, and have been wondering what I can do. I’m so frustrated with the constant bombardment of awful news, and the fact that seemingly nobody I interact with in the real world has any fucking idea that it’s happening.

          Maybe I’ll be that crazy guy that makes his own newsletter and hands it out at work.

          • The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Maybe I’ll be that crazy guy that makes his own newsletter and hands it out at work.

            “It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”

      • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Here is a single thing that anyone should be doing, there are other resources elsewhere. But everyone should be working with their unions or forming unions at their places of work. It is surprisingly easy to do, and even MAGA people can recognize they are being fucked by capital. Unionizing the workplace is where our power lies. It is the thing that fascists have always feared. Use those unions to gain concessions from the bosses. Get higher wages, safer work environments, set schedules, etc.

        Ok, here is a second idea. Feed your neighbors. Go help feed the homeless folk in your community.

        Showing compassion for everyone is a radical act. Build solidarity.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The thing to do to stop this was vote blue no matter who in the 2016 and 2024 elections. Failing that, you’ll have to convince 13 Republicans to impeach and remove Donald Trump.

        But guess what? That won’t happen. No matter what, we’re going to see people suffer and violence in the streets. Whether you’re keeping yourself safe at home or contributing to the violence is up to you.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        0 cosponsors and probably hasn’t even been looked at by the education committed it was submitted to.

        We’re wasting time talking about theoretical nonlaws when theres actual real shit happening.

        • hansolo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          For real. Plus it’s Dem-sponsored, so until it gets an R cosponsor it’s likely not even going to make it to the floor.

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is exactly why musk is not appointed, he can’t be impeached and as you said DOJ and pardons will protect him.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let em keep chopping off the federal government … at one point, individual states will start wondering why they are all interconnected in a union that doesn’t do anything or provide any benefits any more and start acting like independent nations.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It might be worth mentioning that Andrew Johnson signed the Department of Education into law in 1867. It was elevated to a cabinet position in 1979 by Carter from it’s previous position within the Department of Health, Education, And Welfare.

    The idea that the government has a constitutional interest in fostering the education of the public is NOT a new thing contrary to what conservatives would have you believe. An educated populace is an essential function of a representative democracy.

      • But I can’t figure out why. A society with severe brain drain would lead to reduced quality of life for them as well. Are they just banking on AI to do everything while everyone dies in rebellions and counter-rebellions? Shit, that’s probably it.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, I also don’t understand why they’re aiming for this kind of society. Eventually they’ll cut so much that the actual pie will shrink, so they’ll end up getting less while being surrounded by slums.

        • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Fascists aren’t particularly smart. They tend to lose in the long run because they just cannot comprehend anything complex. All their philosophy is wishful thinking and simple heuristics that follow their preconceived notions about the superiority of their in group.

          They want feudalism because they can’t stand anyone having power other than the people who deserve to rule. They can’t stand that non elites can vote, demand decent wages, etc. so they want feudalism without understanding the downstream effects of that.

          They are just fucking dumb. And that is why, if we get enough time, we will win against them. Climate change might get us. But we will fucking destroy these no knowing fuck wits.

        • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          If everything is going to shit, getting a slightly less shit deal even if it means everyone else gets a whole lot more shit is a deal people will take just about 10/10 times across an electorate.

        • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Think of the rich as aliens. Extract all the wealth from available resources and then move on to the next country. More likely than not, they will die before any of their damage matters enough to bother them. This is why they want to drill.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Neura-starlink, first on prisoners, then on everyone else and apparently the op paperclip people in conjunction with USA make the thousand year reign a reality.

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          They measure their quality of life by their ability to dominate others. On top of the desire for feudalism for many of them is a desire for theocracy. For them politics peaked at the divine right of kings.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The executive order’s a symbolic gesture—Congress won’t scrap the Department outright. But the subtext? Steady erosion. Shift student debt oversight to Treasury, pare back civil rights investigations, let federal education funds atrophy. States then fill the vacuum: red ones push vouchers, defund “woke” curricula, blue ones scramble to plug gaps.

    The playbook’s transparent. Undermine trust in public institutions, then offer “choice” as salvation. Rural GOP districts take the bait, then recoil when their Title I lunches and special ed services evaporate. Even conservatives quietly rely on federal data systems and grant streams—hypocrisy’s baked in.

    Latest school choice expansions? Distraction tactics. Real damage accrues in the margins: disabled students lose protections, civil rights complaints backlog, teacher retention plummets. ED’s survived 40 years of GOP vitriol because dismantling it’s all optics, no payoff.

    Predictable cycle. Provoke outrage, let chaos incentivize privatization. Rinse, repeat.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The executive order’s a symbolic gesture—Congress won’t scrap the Department outright.

      You’re wrong. They will not wait for Congress to do anything.

      Who the fuck is going to stop them, you?

      • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The courts, actually. Been there since Nixon tried similar stunts. Administrative state’s got more staying power than most realize. But hey, doom scrolling’s more fun than reading SCOTUS precedents.

        • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh, the SCOTUS that said anything done by a sitting president is automatically legal? That one?

          • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Ah, you mean the unitary executive theory? That magical interpretation where presidential power is somehow absolute? Fascinating how selective that reading was—worked great for executive orders, not so much for criminal immunity.

            The courts have been remarkably… flexible with precedent lately. But even in this twilight zone version of constitutional law, there’s still that pesky difference between issuing orders and having them actually implemented. The machinery of state has its own peculiar physics.

            Though I suppose when SCOTUS is rewriting administrative law on the fly, precedent becomes more of a suggestion than a rule. Welcome to the constitutional speedrun era.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              They will physically remove people from their jobs if it comes down to it, regardless of the legality of the order. You really don’t seem to get it.

              • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                Physical force is amateur hour thinking. You can march people out at gunpoint, sure. Then what? Who runs payroll? Maintains infrastructure? Implements policy? Even dictatorships need functioning bureaucracy.

                But keep thinking might-makes-right while actual power plays happen in budget meetings and administrative procedures.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Nobody runs payroll, my dude. They want it to fail. They’ve spelled it out in Project 2025, the entire point is “dismantling the administrative state,” and they’ve shown every single day in the past two weeks, that they are doing exactly that.

                  Until people accept the reality of the situation, it’s just going to get worse.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          We already have precedent for a president ignoring a SCOTUS decision (Andrew Jackson).

          Does the Supreme Court have some kind of secret police force that makes sure the other two branches of the government follow their rulings?

          In fascism, might makes right, and the person with the biggest guns/army gets what they want, or else they just fucking kill you.

          • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Jackson’s precedent created a constitutional crisis that haunted executive power for generations. But let’s ignore history because “guns solve everything,” right?

            And no, SCOTUS doesn’t need secret police when they have the entire administrative state’s inertia. The machine keeps running because people show up, file papers, and follow procedure—not because someone’s pointing weapons.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Jackson’s precedent created a constitutional crisis that haunted executive power for generations. But let’s ignore history because “guns solve everything,” right?

              Eh? Do you think I was agreeing with Jackson (or in this case Trump), or condoning it?

              It’s just history.

              And no, SCOTUS doesn’t need secret police when they have the entire administrative state’s inertia. The machine keeps running because people show up, file papers, and follow procedure—not because someone’s pointing weapons.

              Speaking of history, it seems like you need to learn some things (or refresh your memory). Because this is exactly how society has always worked. The majority of human civilization has been this.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The playbook’s transparent. Undermine trust in public institutions, then offer “choice” as salvation.

      So that’s the game

      • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Been the Republicans game for as long as I can remember.

        “The government sucks, it’s too big, and it’s broken. Elect me so I can break it more to prove I was right”

    • Kayday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Congress doesn’t need to be okay with it if Elon’s cronies waltz in and kick everyone out.

      • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ah, the classic “just do it anyway” approach. Cute, but federal agencies have this pesky thing called statutory authority. Even Elon’s crew can’t magic away the Administrative Procedure Act. Though watching them try would be… entertaining.

        • Stegget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          What about the last eight years has made you think these people will follow the rule of law?

          • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            adjusts reading glasses, sips coffee

            Look, I get the revolutionary fervor—very 2025 energy. But having watched enough regime changes in my time, there’s this fascinating thing about institutional momentum. Even when someone kicks in the door waving the proverbial .44, bureaucracy has its own gravity.

            Sure, the last eight years showed some… creative interpretations of executive power. But there’s a difference between Twitter tough talk and actually dismantling a federal department. Those career civil servants? They’ve survived multiple “this time it’s different” moments.

            Not saying the system’s perfect—hell, it’s a mess. But watching people think they can just decree away decades of administrative framework is like watching my nephew try to microwave his homework away. Entertaining, but not quite how things work.

            Then again, what do I know? I just watch the pendulum swing.

            • Stegget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I understand your argument. But the entire premise is grounded in the assumption of courts upholding precedent and not letting an executive operate outside the confines of the law. The president has immunity. Congress is ineffectual at best and actively evil at worst. I mean for fucks sake, the current occupant of the White House lead an attempted coup and is still being permitted to sign, enact and decree legislation. If the checks and balances in our system were functioning, I’d be willing to get in line with you. But it’s so painfully clear that they are not.

      • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Rule by decree? My brother in Christ, have you met the federal bureaucracy? Even if they published the order tomorrow, implementation would take years of litigation. Death by a thousand memoranda.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I was going to ask if this means I no longer have to pay back my student loans, but of course I know better than that.

  • dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Remember when Bush pushed the “No Child Left Behind Act”, and we all realized the federalization of control over education was deeply problematic and removed democratic control over education? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

    The government not handling every social function in society isn’t scary on its own. That in combination with the people as a whole having no control over the economy is when that becomes nasty (i.e., economic inequality). That is of course the vision of the ruling class.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Remember when Bush pushed the “No Child Left Behind Act”, and we all realized the federalization of control over education was deeply problematic

      Yeah, that’s not the lesson I learned from that…