Wi-Fi jamming to knock out cameras suspected in nine Minnesota burglaries – smart security systems vulnerable as tech becomes cheaper and easier to acquire::A serial burglar in Edina, Minnesota is suspected of using a Wi-Fi jammer to knock out connected security cameras before stealing and making off with lots of loot. Such techniques are increasingly popular with criminals.

  • aname@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The cloud is not the problem. Inadequate local buffer is the problem.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If it’s got local storage, it’s not ‘cloud based’.

      I’m not saying offsite backups of your local storage are a bad idea.

      • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The jammers don’t disable the cameras, they just prevent them from streaming the captured video to the recording machine.

        If the cameras had a local buffer, they’d be able to keep recording even if the signal was jammed.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Until the cameras are destroyed, which is easier to do when they’re not streaming in real time

      • aname@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        You cannot block a camera from seeing by jamming the wifi. It could simply save the video feed locally and send it to the server when the wifi is restored.