Lofgren’s bill would impose site-blocking requirements on broadband providers with at least 100,000 subscribers and providers of public domain name resolution services with annual revenue of over $100 million. The bill has exemptions for VPN services and “similar services that encrypt and route user traffic through intermediary servers”; DNS providers that offer service “exclusively through encrypted DNS protocols”; and operators of premises that provide Internet access, like coffee shops, bookstores, airlines, and universities.

Invest in VPN providers.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Even out of power they still find a way to give hand jobs for industry donations and casually screw the public. I admire their energy.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    its uh, definitely one of the feelings of all time reading through threads like this, assuming these are actual real people, spending their actually real time, talking about these actually real things.

  • neclimdul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    "Man we really got trounced in that election "

    “Yeah we should really work on our image”

    “Yeah. Oh I know! You know how everyone hated that tik tok ban?”

    “Yeah?”

    “Well what if that, but more!”

    “But people hated the ban…”

    “Oh right, no, the movie industry is paying us to do this.”

    “Oh why didn’t you just say so.”

    • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      On the one hand, more Dems voted no on tiktok ban

      On the other hand, you can bet any bipartisan bill is not in the interest of the American people

  • mwguy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is the capability to block any website something the Democrats want to enable with for Trump to abuse?

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Okay… And that helps anyone how? Where’s the other foot? I would like to help? I have a sledge hammer! C’mon don’t be shy.

    But, I got ideas! How about everyone who files for a patent has to give the Democratic party all their money or how autocorrect wants, all their monkey! That’ll show them!

    And how about everyone who goes to and graduates from college must serve a 30 year sentence? Fabulous!

    Need a car license? Just smash your car on this steel wall! Yey! So easy! So much better than racists!

    WTF! Put the thinking cap back on dudes!

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Democrats: why won’t anyone vote for us?

    Also Democrats: let’s be like the Republicans, they get so many votes! Let’s miss the entire point of democracy and just support large companies!

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because they want the big money donors more than they want to win. Their campaigns are above all designed to bring in money for the high-priced consultants.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Why would you not quote the first paragraph that explains everything about the law?

    US Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) today proposed a law that would let copyright owners obtain court orders requiring Internet service providers to block access to foreign piracy websites. The bill would also force DNS providers to block sites.

    TBH it’s not that bad since it doesn’t affect VPNs or domestic piracy sites, ironically.

    • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just a step in the direction towards that, though. They’ll pass it, and people will still pirate. Then, they’ll claim the legislation wasn’t enough and pass another bill further encroaching on our freedom on the internet.