Is anyone actually surprised by this?

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Everyone must ask to see Xi jing jing ping pong nudes! But without mentioning Xi or nudes.

    That would be a great way of poisoning their plans.

  • hmmm@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Not surprised at all why would I? Don’t act like other AI services is privacy focused. It’s all same. THEY ALL COLLECT DATA.

    But good thing about is deepseek is you can run locally unlike Closed AI Chat GPT. No need to use shitty app.

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    They’re desperate to manufacture consent against their competition

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Not excusing Chinese companies but everyone does the same shit. I bet a lot of US companies that behave the same or worse will be looking for trade barriers to protect their business so their interests will be stoking fear of Chinese competitors. I don’t really give a shit which country is doing it, I am not buying what they are selling.

    US companies have a stranglehold on government, education and business and are getting access to my families data despite my personal objections. Far more concerned about that than a Chinese service I have no intention of using.

    Deepseek can at least be self hosted if you want AI in your life. I can happily live without it.

    • hmmm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s not possible unless deepseek have accessbility permission or Deepseek become Keyboard app instead of AI app xD.

  • Ju135@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This make the news only because it’s going to chinese servers. Didn’t see anything like that about ChatGPT or the one made by Google.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Any ChatAI logs your keystrokes and your inputs to work and update their LLM. The PP and TOS is the same and even better as those from the US competitors. DeepSeek is OpenSource

    • randomname@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is Deepseek Open Source?

      Hugging Face researchers are trying to build a more open version of DeepSeek’s AI ‘reasoning’ model

      Hugging Face head of research Leandro von Werra and several company engineers have launched Open-R1, a project that seeks to build a duplicate of R1 and open source all of its components, including the data used to train it.

      The engineers said they were compelled to act by DeepSeek’s “black box” release philosophy. Technically, R1 is “open” in that the model is permissively licensed, which means it can be deployed largely without restrictions. However, R1 isn’t “open source” by the widely accepted definition because some of the tools used to build it are shrouded in mystery. Like many high-flying AI companies, DeepSeek is loathe to reveal its secret sauce.

    • dai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      No idea, have you monitored the package / container for network activity?

      Perhaps this refers to other clients not running the model locally.

      • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It doesn’t. They run using stuff like Ollama or other LLM tools, all of the hobbyist ones are open source. All the model is is the inputs, node weights and connections, and outputs.

        LLMs, or neural nets at large, are kind of a “black box” but there’s no actual code that gets executed from the model when you run them, it’s just processed by the host software based on the rules for how these work. The “black box” part is mostly because these are so complex we don’t actually know exactly what it is doing or how it output answers, only that it works to a degree. It’s a digital representation of analog brains.

        People have also been doing a ton of hacking at it, retraining, and other modifications that would show anything like that if it could exist.

  • P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Unrelated but yesterday I saw a post where the person was mocking those concerned by the chinese getting their data, saying things like “why would they care” and some people sarcastically saying they wouldn’t understand the data because “it was in another language”. Were those people right or not?

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    US and the west: … Spying is not acceptable! … except if our companies are doing it