• jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes and no. Not many people can afford the hardware required to run the biggest LLMs. So the majority of people will just use the psyops vanilla version that China wants you to use. All while collecting more data and influencing the public like what TikTok is doing.

    Also another thing with Open source. It’s just as easy to be closed as it is open with zero warnings. They own the license. They control the narrative.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        When there is free software, the user is the product. It’s just a psyops tool disguised as a FOSS.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          How are you the product if you can download, mod, and control every part of it?

          Ever heard of WinRAR?

          Audacity? VLC media player? Libre office? Gimp? Fruitloops? Deluge?

          Literally any free open source standalone software ever made?

          Just admit that you aren’t capable of approaching this subject unbiasly.

          • jaschen@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            You just named Western FOSS companies and completely ignored the “psyops” part. This is a Chinese psyops tool disguised as a FOSS.

            99.9999999999999999999% can’t afford or have the ability to download and mod their own 67B model. The vast majority of the people who will use it will be using Deepseek vanilla servers. They can collect a mass amount of data and also control the narrative on what is truth or not. Think TikTok but on a work computer.