Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

      • Chozo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m snarky because I’m annoyed at seeing the constant FUD being lauded around here. Sorry if that snark comes off as hostile.

        Yes, Meta is a shit corp who doesn’t deserve any free pass. However, ActivityPub wasn’t built with exclusion in mind. Nor does the protocol allow Meta access to anything that you aren’t already giving up freely to thousands upon thousands of other servers (many of whom cannot or will not respect your rights to data privacy) whenever you use any Fediverse platform.

        People who are scared of Meta joining the Fediverse simply do not understand how the Fediverse works, or misunderstand the design philosophy of ActivityPub.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          ActivityPub wasn’t built with exclusion in mind

          Yes it was, that’s what defederation is for. The potential for exclusion is literally built into the design philosophy of federated networks. Every instance has the freedom to not host Meta’s crap. I don’t know why people don’t understand this.

          You’ve also made the point that the information is still accessible, so it’s not like we’re taking down their instance. We’re just turning it into a pariah to devalue it, and if enough instances do this, I guess that means the action is popular. If it wasn’t, it wouldn’t succeed. There’s very little to debate here, it just sounds like you don’t like people using their power to do something you disagree with. Sorry, that’s up to those people. It’s not for you to dictate what other people do with federation.

        • sour@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          have different problem

          platform owned by corporation tends to have more pro corporate users

          what happens to existing culture on fediverse

          is general trend that online communities get worse when above threshold

          • Chozo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            what happens to existing culture on fediverse

            Likely nothing. If Threads users are problematic and Meta refuses to moderate them appropriately, then instances can defederate later.

            Doing it preemptively or forming a pact is just absurd, though. It’s treating the users of Threads as a threat, instead of Meta (who can and will still be able to harvest anything they want from the Fediverse, because that’s how ActivityPub works), and that’s not fair to them who didn’t ask to be thrown into our community in the first place.

          • mateomaui@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Most people on Threads aren’t pro-corporate, they don’t actually give a shit about that. They’re just too confused by the decentralized model to be on Mastodon, couldn’t get an invite to Bluesky, and wanted somewhere to be other than Twitter.

            Being connected to it all via Threads could eventually help them get enough understanding to migrate to a different instance.