You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The founders probably imagined no self respecting person, oligarch or otherwise, would want to live under authoritarian rule.

    Turns out the 21st century bourgeois is full of pussy ass bitches.

    • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They never could have imagined our modern society at all. The amount of power and influence held by just a handful of private citizens couldn’t have been accounted for in the 18th century.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        I’m just speaking from a matter of principle. They don’t have to know the conditions to conclude living under a kings rule in any condition is unappealing.