I’m spinning up a new seedbox and wanted to know what is everyone using nowadays? I was using deluge via the thick client and rutorrent previously. Are they still king? edit: I should have also mentioned that I plan on running this server headless so I will need to be able to access it via a thin client or a web browser

  • Fleppensteyn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I keep recommending Tribler and I don’t know why it’s not more popular. Anything wrong with it?

    • megaman@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I appreciate the ability for the tor-like layered routing with tribler. Getting the headless UI set up is annoying, though.

    • nfms@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve got Transmission on my NAS and use Transmission-remote(Linux and android) for the client. Simple, easy to setup and it just works.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Random semi-related thought. I’m going through the comparison of BitTorrent clients page on Wikipedia and it’s amazing how many clients end up as Adware.

      • SatyrSack@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Closed source, and their prominent “contains NO Spyware” disclaimer doesn’t quite instill confidence. I have also never even heard about it until now.

        • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t use that client either - But to be fair the dev (Kevin Hearn) has a long history with P2P software e.g. depending how old you are you may have used his WinMX software back in the day. He isn’t known for sticking spyware/malware into his software so I sort of trust the software he puts out in that sense. He also maintains other non-torrent P2P file sharing software outside of Tixati.

          Of course it would be better if it was open source but he’s never been an open source coder AFAIK.

        • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve had email communication with the devs and again, I’m a biased donor. They are just starting afloat on donations. Respect your closed source concerns completely, but it’s a superior piece of software imo and I see no signs of malificence. If you are an open source purist I get it, there are other options. If you are using any closed source software at all though, it would seem to me hypocritical to show a bias against this particular app.

  • TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I used transmission for years, but the larger my library got the more issues I had. Currently using Qbit and loving the categories for easier management, especially with the *arr suite.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Still qbittorrent. Docker container with web UI makes it trivial.

    • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Deluge always seems so underrepresented, but as far as I know it’s never had a version compromised with malware like some of the other popular clients. It also performs great when you are seeding over 1000 torrents as long as you upgrade to version two.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Better to use the underrepresented torrent clients. They have the least chance of enshittification.

        looks at µTorrent