psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoApple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Boughtnymag.comexternal-linkmessage-square252fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkApple Vision Pro Owners Are Struggling to Figure Out What They Just Boughtnymag.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square252fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoDon’t they cancel each other out?
minus-squareGormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoUnfortunately they multiply instead of cancel
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoOne times one is still one
minus-squaretofubl@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-29 months agoi times i is -1, though. Imagine that!
minus-squaredouble_oh_walter@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoHmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that. This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-29 months agoNo, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii. Two sexy, sexy dingii
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·9 months agoNow the singular is “dingius?”
Don’t they cancel each other out?
Unfortunately they multiply instead of cancel
One times one is still one
i times i is -1, though. Imagine that!
That’s too complex for me.
Hmm. They might. Hadn’t thought of that.
This requires more research. You must buy one - for science! And, I guess, for “science “.
No, if you touch two dingii together you still have two dingii.
Two sexy, sexy dingii
Now the singular is “dingius?”